Literature DB >> 12755517

Two biomedical sublanguages: a description based on the theories of Zellig Harris.

Carol Friedman1, Pauline Kra, Andrey Rzhetsky.   

Abstract

Natural language processing (NLP) systems have been developed to provide access to the tremendous body of data and knowledge that is available in the biomedical domain in the form of natural language text. These NLP systems are valuable because they can encode and amass the information in the text so that it can be used by other automated processes to improve patient care and our understanding of disease processes and treatments. Zellig Harris proposed a theory of sublanguage that laid the foundation for natural language processing in specialized domains. He hypothesized that the informational content and structure form a specialized language that can be delineated in the form of a sublanguage grammar. The grammar can then be used by a language processor to capture and encode the salient information and relations in text. In this paper, we briefly summarize his language and sublanguage theories. In addition, we summarize our prior research, which is associated with the sublanguage grammars we developed for two different biomedical domains. These grammars illustrate how Harris' theories provide a basis for the development of language processing systems in the biomedical domain. The two domains and their associated sublanguages discussed are: the clinical domain, where the text consists of patient reports, and the biomolecular domain, where the text consists of complete journal articles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12755517     DOI: 10.1016/s1532-0464(03)00012-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  57 in total

1.  Document clustering of clinical narratives: a systematic study of clinical sublanguages.

Authors:  Olga Patterson; John F Hurdle
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

2.  Enhancing clinical concept extraction with distributional semantics.

Authors:  Siddhartha Jonnalagadda; Trevor Cohen; Stephen Wu; Graciela Gonzalez
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Coreference analysis in clinical notes: a multi-pass sieve with alternate anaphora resolution modules.

Authors:  Siddhartha Reddy Jonnalagadda; Dingcheng Li; Sunghwan Sohn; Stephen Tze-Inn Wu; Kavishwar Wagholikar; Manabu Torii; Hongfang Liu
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Finding related sentence pairs in MEDLINE.

Authors:  Larry H Smith; W John Wilbur
Journal:  Inf Retr Boston       Date:  2010-01-23       Impact factor: 2.293

5.  Characterizing the sublanguage of online breast cancer forums for medications, symptoms, and emotions.

Authors:  Noémie Elhadad; Shaodian Zhang; Patricia Driscoll; Samuel Brody
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2014-11-14

6.  Towards semantic role labeling & IE in the medical literature.

Authors:  Yacov Kogan; Nigel Collier; Serguei Pakhomov; Michael Krauthammer
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

7.  Determining prominent subdomains in medicine.

Authors:  Powell J Bernhardt; Susanne M Humphrey; Thomas C Rindflesch
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

8.  Essie: a concept-based search engine for structured biomedical text.

Authors:  Nicholas C Ide; Russell F Loane; Dina Demner-Fushman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Domain adaption of parsing for operative notes.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Serguei Pakhomov; James O Ryan; Genevieve B Melton
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 10.  Conceptual knowledge acquisition in biomedicine: A methodological review.

Authors:  Philip R O Payne; Eneida A Mendonça; Stephen B Johnson; Justin B Starren
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 6.317

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.