Literature DB >> 12753874

Performance of quantitative ultrasound in the discrimination of prevalent osteoporotic fractures in a bone metabolic unit.

F López-Rodríguez1, P Mezquita-Raya, J de Dios Luna, F Escobar-Jiménez, M Muñoz-Torres.   

Abstract

There is a growing interest in ultrasound evaluation of bone status as an alternative to the measurement with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), due to its low cost, portability, and nonionizing radiation. The aim of our study was to investigate the relation among DXA, QUS, clinical, anthropometric, and lifestyle factors, and to determine QUS cutoff values in order to discriminate fractures in patients referred to the Bone Metabolic Unit at an Endocrinology Service. We studied 300 patients (281 females and 19 males; age 58 +/- 11 years) referred for evaluation of osteoporosis. In all cases we determined basic anthropometric parameters, a clinical history including previous osteoporotic fractures and risk factors for osteoporosis, and QUS parameters in calcaneus (Hologic Sahara), and BMD in lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN), by DXA (Hologic QDR 1000). Using the WHO densitometric criteria, 37, 46.7, and 16.3% of our population were osteoporotic, osteopenic, and normal, respectively. A QUI T-score </=-1.5 SD provided a sensitivity of 68.9% and a specificity of 64.7% for osteoporotic fracture discrimination and a sensitivity of 64.9% and a specificity of 74.1% for osteoporosis defined by WHO criteria using DXA. In the logistic regression, the presence of family history of fragility fractures (OR: 3.03; CI 95%: 1.3-7.03), a DXA T-score </=-2.5 (OR: 3.58; CI 95%: 1.66-7.73), and a QUI T-score </=-1.5 (OR: 2.56; CI 95%: 1.15-5.69) were independently associated with prevalent osteoporotic fractures. In conclusion, calcaneus ultrasound appears as a useful technique for the routine clinical practice, as its performance is similar to DXA for the discrimination of subjects with osteoporotic fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12753874     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(03)00058-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  10 in total

1.  Characteristics of calcaneus quantitative ultrasound normative data in Chinese mainland men and women.

Authors:  W Liu; C-L Xu; Z-Q Zhu; W Wang; S-M Han; S-Y Zu; G-J Zhu
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Prediction of absolute risk of non-spinal fractures using clinical risk factors and heel quantitative ultrasound.

Authors:  A Díez-Pérez; J González-Macías; F Marín; M Abizanda; R Alvarez; A Gimeno; E Pegenaute; J Vila
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) in the Management of Osteoporosis and Assessment of Fracture Risk: An Update.

Authors:  Didier Hans; Antoine Métrailler; Elena Gonzalez Rodriguez; Olivier Lamy; Enisa Shevroja
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Quantitative ultrasound calcaneus measurements: normative data for the Greek population.

Authors:  Faidon Magkos; Yannis Manios; Eirini Babaroutsi; Labros S Sidossis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Measurement of human trabecular bone by novel ultrasonic bone densitometry based on fast and slow waves.

Authors:  T Yamamoto; T Otani; H Hagino; H Katagiri; T Okano; I Mano; R Teshima
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Correlation of bone mineral density with biochemical markers in post menopausal women.

Authors:  S Agrawal; Anju Jain; D Mahajan; C Raghunandan
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2009-09-16

7.  Identifying osteoporosis in a primary care setting with quantitative ultrasound: relationship to anthropometric and lifestyle factors.

Authors:  Ayfer Gemalmaz; Guzel Discigil; Nazli Sensoy; Okay Basak
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Effect of educational intervention using the Internet on quantitative ultrasound parameters in prevention of osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial in young Japanese women.

Authors:  Kazumi Asakawa; Katsuhiro Koyama; Zentaro Yamagata
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2011-12-13

9.  Screening for low bone mass with quantitative ultrasonography in a community without dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: population-based survey.

Authors:  Nan-Ping Yang; Ian Jen; Shao-Yuan Chuang; Shui-Hu Chen; Pesus Chou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Discriminative ability of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in men with hip or distal forearm fractures.

Authors:  Fatih Cesme; Sina Esmaeilzadeh; Aydan Oral
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2016-09-25       Impact factor: 1.511

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.