Literature DB >> 15241583

Quantitative ultrasound calcaneus measurements: normative data for the Greek population.

Faidon Magkos1, Yannis Manios, Eirini Babaroutsi, Labros S Sidossis.   

Abstract

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is a peripheral bone densitometry technique that is rapidly gaining in popularity, and is widely used worldwide for the assessment of skeletal status. This, however, generally occurs in the absence of adequate clinical guidelines. As accurate interpretation of the results and correct classification in individual fracture risk assessment are of great value, the present study was carried out to establish a reference database for calcaneal QUS measurements across age group and gender in Greece. A total of 1205 subjects (821 females and 384 males) from three age groups (409 children, 341 adults and 455 elderly) were recruited. QUS measurements were performed at the heel with the Sahara device, which measures broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS), and then combines these variables into a single parameter, the quantitative ultrasound index (QUI). Overall, gender-related differences were more pronounced among the elderly, while age-related differences were more pronounced among females. Elderly men had higher QUS parameters than women of peer age, but no major gender differences were observed in children and adults. In males, only BUA showed a variation with age, being higher in adult and elderly men compared to boys. On the other hand, all QUS parameters varied significantly with age in females, the general trends being mildly positive from childhood to adulthood, when peak levels were observed, and negative thereafter. The results for the Greek population were in the range reported previously for other populations, but some discrepancies were evident, probably resulting from ethno-specific characteristics and different QUS instrumentation. Importantly, using the manufacturer's or the local database as the reference population for computing T-scores led to significantly different classification of subjects into conventional categories of risk. These data could be useful as a guide for comparing the results of individual studies, as well as for the assessment of Greek men and women at risk of fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15241583     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-004-1670-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  56 in total

1.  Age changes of calcaneal ultrasonometry in healthy German women.

Authors:  P Hadji; O Hars; K Bock; U Albert; M W Beckmann; G Emons; K Schulz
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Age-specific values and cutoff levels for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in quantitative ultrasound measurements at the calcaneus with SAHARA in healthy Japanese women: Japanese population-based osteoporosis (JPOS) study.

Authors:  Y Ikeda; M Iki; A Morita; H Aihara; S Kagamimori; Y Kagawa; T Matsuzaki; H Yoneshima; F Marumo
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2002-06-20       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Discriminatory ability of quantitative ultrasound parameters and bone mineral density in a population-based sample of postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures: results of the Basel Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  F Hartl; A Tyndall; M Kraenzlin; C Bachmeier; C Gückel; U Senn; D Hans; R Theiler
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Prediction of mechanical properties of the human calcaneus by broadband ultrasonic attenuation.

Authors:  C M Langton; C F Njeh; R Hodgskinson; J D Currey
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Comparison of six calcaneal quantitative ultrasound devices: precision and hip fracture discrimination.

Authors:  C F Njeh; D Hans; J Li; B Fan; T Fuerst; Y Q He; E Tsuda-Futami; Y Lu; C Y Wu; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Contact quantitative ultrasound: an evaluation of precision, fracture discrimination, age-related bone loss and applicability of the WHO criteria.

Authors:  M L Frost; G M Blake; I Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Precision of quantitative ultrasound measurement of the heel bone and effects of ambient temperature on the parameters.

Authors:  M Iki; E Kajita; S Mitamura; H Nishino; T Yamagami; N Nagahama
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Medical costs of osteoporosis.

Authors:  R J Norris
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Quantitative ultrasound calcaneus measurements: normative data and precision in the spanish population.

Authors:  M Sosa; P Saavedra; M Muñoz-Torres; J Alegre; C Gómez; J González-Macías; N Guañabens; F Hawkins; C Lozano; M Martínez; J Mosquera; R Pérez-Cano; M Quesada; E Salas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Quantitative ultrasound bone measurements: normal values and comparison with bone mineral density by dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  M Moris; A Peretz; R Tjeka; N Negaban; M Wouters; P Bergmann
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.333

View more
  10 in total

1.  Age curves of bone mineral density at the distal radius and calcaneus in Koreans.

Authors:  Jin-Young Min; Kyoung-Bok Min; Domyung Paek; Daehee Kang; Sung-Il Cho
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Possible site-specific effect of an intervention combining nutrition and lifestyle counselling with consumption of fortified dairy products on bone mass: the Postmenopausal Health Study II.

Authors:  George Moschonis; Spyridon Kanellakis; Nikolaos Papaioannou; Anne Schaafsma; Yannis Manios
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Calcaneus ultrasound in males: normative data in the Croatian population (ECUM study).

Authors:  D Kastelan; M Kujundzic-Tiljak; I Kraljevic; I Kardum; Z Giljevic; M Korsic
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Characteristics of calcaneus quantitative ultrasound normative data in Chinese mainland men and women.

Authors:  W Liu; C-L Xu; Z-Q Zhu; W Wang; S-M Han; S-Y Zu; G-J Zhu
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Are Children Suffering From Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia Associated With Decreased Bone Strength?

Authors:  Ge Yang; Siyu Xu; Haibo Mei; Guanghui Zhu; Yaoxi Liu; Qian Tan; Hui Yu
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.569

6.  Association of physical exercise and calcium intake with bone mass measured by quantitative ultrasound.

Authors:  Yannis Dionyssiotis; Ioanna Paspati; Georgios Trovas; Antonios Galanos; Georgios P Lyritis
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  Low bone mineral density in COPD patients related to worse lung function, low weight and decreased fat-free mass.

Authors:  A Vrieze; M H G de Greef; P J Wijkstra; P J Wýkstra; J B Wempe
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Menstrual irregularity and bone mass in premenopausal women: cross-sectional associations with testosterone and SHBG.

Authors:  Shuying Wei; Graeme Jones; Russell Thomson; Petr Otahal; Terry Dwyer; Alison Venn
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  The ability of calcaneal and multisite quantitative ultrasound variables in the identification of osteoporosis in women and men.

Authors:  Aydan Oral; Sina Esmaeilzadeh; Ayşe Yalıman; Dilşad Sindel; Pınar Kürsüz Köseoğlu; Tuğba Aydın
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-07-30

10.  The Prevalence of Osteopenia and Osteoporosis Among Malaysian Type 2 Diabetic Patients Using Quantitative Ultrasound Densitometer.

Authors:  Shaymaa Abdalwahed Abdulameer; Mohanad Naji Sahib; Syed Azhar Syed Sulaiman
Journal:  Open Rheumatol J       Date:  2018-04-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.