Literature DB >> 12752739

What factors are associated with a woman's decision to take hormone replacement therapy? Evaluated in the context of a decision aid.

Heather D Clark1, Annette M O'Connor, Ian D Graham, George A Wells.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To understand the factors associated with a post-menopausal woman deciding to take hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after reviewing a decision aid (DA) and having a counselling visit with her physician as well as the factors associated with the act of taking HRT 2 months after the counselling interview.
DESIGN: A secondary analysis of data collected for a randomized controlled trial evaluating two DAs. MAIN OUTCOME
RESULTS: Although 28% of women were uncertain regarding their decision after the counselling interview, only 2.4% of women, at the assessment at 2 months, had not made a decision. The most significant factor associated with the decision to take HRT, after the physician visit, was the physician preference (OR: 62, 95% CI: 13.3, 289.7). Physician preference (OR: 78, 95% CI: 6.2, 975) remained the most significant factor for taking HRT 2 months after the counselling interview followed by low uncertainty about the decision (OR: 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2, 0.7).
CONCLUSION: Physician preference was the factor that was most associated with the woman's decision following counselling and 2 months later. Qualitative evaluation of the interview process involving the patient and physician would determine whether the patient and physician are reaching a shared decision or is the physician preference influencing the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12752739      PMCID: PMC5060175          DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00216.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  18 in total

1.  Guidelines for counseling postmenopausal women about preventive hormone therapy. American College of Physicians.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Hormone replacement therapy--a survey of perimenopausal women in a community setting.

Authors:  A Z Kadri
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  A decision tree for the use of estrogen replacement therapy or hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women: consensus opinion of The North American Menopause Society.

Authors: 
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Estrogen replacement therapy. A survey of women's knowledge and attitudes.

Authors:  K J Ferguson; C Hoegh; S Johnson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1989-01

7.  Validation of a decisional conflict scale.

Authors:  A M O'Connor
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1995 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Statistical considerations in the design and analysis of community intervention trials.

Authors:  A Donner; N Klar
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: the satisfaction with decision scale.

Authors:  M Holmes-Rovner; J Kroll; N Schmitt; D R Rovner; M L Breer; M L Rothert; G Padonu; G Talarczyk
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1996 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  A menopause-specific quality of life questionnaire: development and psychometric properties.

Authors:  J R Hilditch; J Lewis; A Peter; B van Maris; A Ross; E Franssen; G H Guyatt; P G Norton; E Dunn
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  3 in total

1.  Chemotherapy use and patient treatment preferences in advanced colorectal cancer: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  S Yousuf Zafar; Jennifer L Malin; Steven C Grambow; David H Abbott; Jane T Kolimaga; Leah L Zullig; Jane C Weeks; John Z Ayanian; Katherine L Kahn; Patricia A Ganz; Paul J Catalano; Dee W West; Dawn Provenzale
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions.

Authors:  Janet Jull; Sascha Köpke; Maureen Smith; Meg Carley; Jeanette Finderup; Anne C Rahn; Laura Boland; Sandra Dunn; Andrew A Dwyer; Jürgen Kasper; Simone Maria Kienlin; France Légaré; Krystina B Lewis; Anne Lyddiatt; Claudia Rutherford; Junqiang Zhao; Tamara Rader; Ian D Graham; Dawn Stacey
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-08

3.  Decisional conflict among patients who accept or decline participation in phase I oncology studies.

Authors:  Kathryn E Flynn; Kevin P Weinfurt; Damon M Seils; Li Lin; Caroline B Burnett; Kevin A Schulman; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.742

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.