Literature DB >> 10746889

A decision tree for the use of estrogen replacement therapy or hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women: consensus opinion of The North American Menopause Society.

.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Menopause is associated with physiologic changes that may have negative effects on quality of life in some women and/or that may increase morbidity and mortality secondary to osteoporosis and/or coronary heart disease. Estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) and combined estrogen/progestogen therapy (hormone replacement therapy [HRT]) play an important role in reducing these negative effects. The North American Menopause Society (NAMS) sought to develop treatment algorithms that could assist the clinician in deciding whether to recommend ERT/HRT to postmenopausal women.
DESIGN: NAMS held a closed conference of experts to develop a decision tree that outlined the rational use of ERT/HRT in postmenopausal women on the basis of risks versus benefits. The proceedings of the conference were used to assist the NAMS Board of Trustees in developing this consensus opinion of the Society.
RESULTS: On the basis of the conference proceedings, NAMS developed three algorithms for the clinician to use as a tool in deciding whether to recommend ERT/HRT to a woman who is postmenopausal: (1) menopause-related symptoms, (2) cardiovascular risk, and (3) osteoporosis risk.
CONCLUSIONS: The goal of ERT/HRT is to enhance women's quality of life as well as to reduce the risks of death and disability associated with osteoporosis and coronary heart disease. The decision to initiate ERT/HRT must be individualized according to each woman's needs. This decision tree for ERT/HRT presents a rational approach to decision making on the basis of the principles of care; details of specific therapeutic interventions will change as data from clinical trials are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10746889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Menopause        ISSN: 1072-3714            Impact factor:   2.953


  6 in total

Review 1.  Estradiol and norgestimate: a review of their combined use as hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  M P Curran; A J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Tapering versus cold turkey: symptoms versus successful discontinuation of menopausal hormone therapy.

Authors:  Jo-Anne Suffoletto; Rachel Hess
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  What factors are associated with a woman's decision to take hormone replacement therapy? Evaluated in the context of a decision aid.

Authors:  Heather D Clark; Annette M O'Connor; Ian D Graham; George A Wells
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 4.  Risks and benefits of hormone replacement therapy: the evidence speaks.

Authors:  Karin H Humphries; Sabrina Gill
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Variation in the psychosocial determinants of the intention to prescribe hormone therapy prior to the release of the Women's Health Initiative trial: a survey of general practitioners and gynaecologists in France and Quebec.

Authors:  France Legare; Gaston Godin; Virginie Ringa; Sylvie Dodin; Lucile Turcot; Joanna Norton
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Why women choose compounded bioidentical hormone therapy: lessons from a qualitative study of menopausal decision-making.

Authors:  Jennifer Jo Thompson; Cheryl Ritenbaugh; Mark Nichter
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 2.809

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.