Literature DB >> 12750348

Effects of population structure and admixture on exact tests for association between Loci.

B Law1, J S Buckleton, C M Triggs, B S Weir.   

Abstract

The probability of multilocus genotype counts conditional on allelic counts and on allelic independence provides a test statistic for independence within and between loci. As the number of loci increases and each sampled genotype becomes unique, the conditional probability becomes a function of total heterozygosity. In that case, it does not address between-locus dependence directly but only indirectly through detection of the Wahlund effect. Moreover, the test will reject the hypothesis of allelic independence only for small values of heterozygosity. Low heterozygosity is expected for population subdivision but not for population admixture. The test may therefore be inappropriate for admixed populations. If individuals with parents in two different populations are always considered to belong to one of the populations, then heterozygosity is increased in that population and the exact test should not be used for sparse data sets from that population. If such a case is suspected, then alternative testing strategies are suggested.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12750348      PMCID: PMC1462537     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  7 in total

1.  Zygotic associations and multilocus statistics in a nonequilibrium diploid population.

Authors:  R C Yang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles.

Authors:  S W Guo; E A Thompson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  A discussion of the law of mutual independence and its application to blood group frequency data.

Authors:  K A Walsh; J S Buckleton
Journal:  J Forensic Sci Soc       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr

4.  Multilocus Structure of Natural Populations of HORDEUM SPONTANEUM.

Authors:  A H Brown; M W Feldman; E Nevo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  A comparison of tests for independence in the FBI RFLP data bases.

Authors:  P J Maiste; B S Weir
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Exact tests for association between alleles at arbitrary numbers of loci.

Authors:  D Zaykin; L Zhivotovsky; B S Weir
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  Detection of nonrandom association of alleles from the distribution of the number of heterozygous loci in a sample.

Authors:  R Chakraborty
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 4.562

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  The factor of 10 in forensic DNA match probabilities.

Authors:  Simone Gittelson; Tamyra R Moretti; Anthony J Onorato; Bruce Budowle; Bruce S Weir; John Buckleton
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.882

Review 2.  Clinical review: Genome-wide association studies of skeletal phenotypes: what we have learned and where we are headed.

Authors:  Yi-Hsiang Hsu; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  ADMIXPIPE: population analyses in ADMIXTURE for non-model organisms.

Authors:  Steven M Mussmann; Marlis R Douglas; Tyler K Chafin; Michael E Douglas
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Variation in genetic admixture and population structure among Latinos: the Los Angeles Latino eye study (LALES).

Authors:  Corina J Shtir; Paul Marjoram; Stanley Azen; David V Conti; Loic Le Marchand; Christopher A Haiman; Rohit Varma
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.797

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.