Yi-Hsiang Hsu1, Douglas P Kiel. 1. Hebrew SeniorLife Institute for Aging Research, 1200 Centre Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02131, USA.
Abstract
CONTEXT: The primary goals of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are to discover new molecular and biological pathways involved in the regulation of bone metabolism that can be leveraged for drug development. In addition, the identified genetic determinants may be used to enhance current risk factor profiles. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: There have been more than 40 published GWAS on skeletal phenotypes, predominantly focused on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry-derived bone mineral density (BMD) of the hip and spine. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Sixty-six BMD loci have been replicated across all the published GWAS, confirming the highly polygenic nature of BMD variation. Only seven of the 66 previously reported genes (LRP5, SOST, ESR1, TNFRSF11B, TNFRSF11A, TNFSF11, PTH) from candidate gene association studies have been confirmed by GWAS. Among 59 novel BMD GWAS loci that have not been reported by previous candidate gene association studies, some have been shown to be involved in key biological pathways involving the skeleton, particularly Wnt signaling (AXIN1, LRP5, CTNNB1, DKK1, FOXC2, HOXC6, LRP4, MEF2C, PTHLH, RSPO3, SFRP4, TGFBR3, WLS, WNT3, WNT4, WNT5B, WNT16), bone development: ossification (CLCN7, CSF1, MEF2C, MEPE, PKDCC, PTHLH, RUNX2, SOX6, SOX9, SPP1, SP7), mesenchymal-stem-cell differentiation (FAM3C, MEF2C, RUNX2, SOX4, SOX9, SP7), osteoclast differentiation (JAG1, RUNX2), and TGF-signaling (FOXL1, SPTBN1, TGFBR3). There are still 30 BMD GWAS loci without prior molecular or biological evidence of their involvement in skeletal phenotypes. Other skeletal phenotypes that either have been or are being studied include hip geometry, bone ultrasound, quantitative computed tomography, high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography, biochemical markers, and fractures such as vertebral, nonvertebral, hip, and forearm. CONCLUSIONS: Although several challenges lie ahead as GWAS moves into the next generation, there are prospects of new discoveries in skeletal biology. This review integrates findings from previous GWAS and provides a roadmap for future directions building on current GWAS successes.
CONTEXT: The primary goals of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are to discover new molecular and biological pathways involved in the regulation of bone metabolism that can be leveraged for drug development. In addition, the identified genetic determinants may be used to enhance current risk factor profiles. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: There have been more than 40 published GWAS on skeletal phenotypes, predominantly focused on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry-derived bone mineral density (BMD) of the hip and spine. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Sixty-six BMD loci have been replicated across all the published GWAS, confirming the highly polygenic nature of BMD variation. Only seven of the 66 previously reported genes (LRP5, SOST, ESR1, TNFRSF11B, TNFRSF11A, TNFSF11, PTH) from candidate gene association studies have been confirmed by GWAS. Among 59 novel BMD GWAS loci that have not been reported by previous candidate gene association studies, some have been shown to be involved in key biological pathways involving the skeleton, particularly Wnt signaling (AXIN1, LRP5, CTNNB1, DKK1, FOXC2, HOXC6, LRP4, MEF2C, PTHLH, RSPO3, SFRP4, TGFBR3, WLS, WNT3, WNT4, WNT5B, WNT16), bone development: ossification (CLCN7, CSF1, MEF2C, MEPE, PKDCC, PTHLH, RUNX2, SOX6, SOX9, SPP1, SP7), mesenchymal-stem-cell differentiation (FAM3C, MEF2C, RUNX2, SOX4, SOX9, SP7), osteoclast differentiation (JAG1, RUNX2), and TGF-signaling (FOXL1, SPTBN1, TGFBR3). There are still 30 BMD GWAS loci without prior molecular or biological evidence of their involvement in skeletal phenotypes. Other skeletal phenotypes that either have been or are being studied include hip geometry, bone ultrasound, quantitative computed tomography, high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography, biochemical markers, and fractures such as vertebral, nonvertebral, hip, and forearm. CONCLUSIONS: Although several challenges lie ahead as GWAS moves into the next generation, there are prospects of new discoveries in skeletal biology. This review integrates findings from previous GWAS and provides a roadmap for future directions building on current GWAS successes.
Authors: Anne-Marie Sims; Neil Shephard; Kim Carter; Tracy Doan; Alison Dowling; Emma L Duncan; John Eisman; Graeme Jones; Geoffrey Nicholson; Richard Prince; Ego Seeman; Gethin Thomas; John A Wass; Matthew A Brown Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Ivan P Gorlov; Olga Y Gorlova; Shamil R Sunyaev; Margaret R Spitz; Christopher I Amos Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Unnur Styrkarsdottir; Bjarni V Halldorsson; Solveig Gretarsdottir; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; G Bragi Walters; Thorvaldur Ingvarsson; Thorbjorg Jonsdottir; Jona Saemundsdottir; Jacqueline R Center; Tuan V Nguyen; Yu Bagger; Jeffrey R Gulcher; John A Eisman; Claus Christiansen; Gunnar Sigurdsson; Augustine Kong; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Kari Stefansson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-04-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Weizhen Ji; Jia Nee Foo; Brian J O'Roak; Hongyu Zhao; Martin G Larson; David B Simon; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Matthew W State; Daniel Levy; Richard P Lifton Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2008-04-06 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Yao-Zhong Liu; Scott G Wilson; Liang Wang; Xiao-Gang Liu; Yan-Fang Guo; Jian Li; Han Yan; Panos Deloukas; Nicole Soranzo; Usha Chinappen-Horsley; Usha Chinnapen-Horsley; Alessandra Cervino; Alesandra Cervino; Frances M Williams; Dong-Hai Xiong; Yin-Ping Zhang; Tian-Bo Jin; Shawn Levy; Christopher J Papasian; Betty M Drees; James J Hamilton; Robert R Recker; Tim D Spector; Hong-Wen Deng Journal: PLoS One Date: 2008-09-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: J B Richards; F Rivadeneira; M Inouye; T M Pastinen; N Soranzo; S G Wilson; T Andrew; M Falchi; R Gwilliam; K R Ahmadi; A M Valdes; P Arp; P Whittaker; D J Verlaan; M Jhamai; V Kumanduri; M Moorhouse; J B van Meurs; A Hofman; H A P Pols; D Hart; G Zhai; B S Kato; B H Mullin; F Zhang; P Deloukas; A G Uitterlinden; T D Spector Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-05-03 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: M D Walker; S Shi; J J Russo; X S Liu; B Zhou; C Zhang; G Liu; D J McMahon; J P Bilezikian; X E Guo Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2014-07-29 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Péter Horváth; Bernadett Balla; János P Kósa; Bálint Tóbiás; Balázs Szili; Gyöngyi Kirschner; Gabriella Győri; Karina Kató; Péter Lakatos; István Takács Journal: J Bone Miner Metab Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 2.626