| Literature DB >> 28273509 |
Simone Gittelson1, Tamyra R Moretti2, Anthony J Onorato2, Bruce Budowle3, Bruce S Weir4, John Buckleton5.
Abstract
An update was performed of the classic experiments that led to the view that profile probability assignments are usually within a factor of 10 of each other. The data used in this study consist of 15 Identifiler loci collected from a wide range of forensic populations. Following Budowle et al. [1], the terms cognate and non-cognate are used. The cognate database is the database from which the profiles are simulated. The profile probability assignment was usually larger in the cognate database. In 44%-65% of the cases, the profile probability for 15 loci in the non-cognate database was within a factor of 10 of the profile probability in the cognate database. This proportion was between 60% and 80% when the FBI and NIST data were used as the non-cognate databases. A second experiment compared the match probability assignment using a generalised database and recommendation 4.2 from NRC II (the 4.2 assignment) with a proxy for the matching proportion developed using subpopulation allele frequencies and the product rule. The findings support that the 4.2 assignment has a large conservative bias. These results are in agreement with previous research results. Published by Elsevier B.V.Entities:
Keywords: Allele frequency; Database; Subpopulations; Weight of evidence
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28273509 PMCID: PMC7722394 DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.02.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Forensic Sci Int Genet ISSN: 1872-4973 Impact factor: 4.882