Literature DB >> 12749930

DNA transfer and cell killing in epidermoid cells by diagnostic ultrasound activation of contrast agent gas bodies in vitro.

Douglas L Miller1, Chunyan Dou, Jianming Song.   

Abstract

DNA transfer by sonoporation and cell killing in monolayer cells were examined by contrast-aided low-power diagnostic ultrasound (US). Culture chambers with epidermoid cell monolayers were scanned at about 1 mm/s with a 1.5-MHz scan head aimed upward at the chamber in a 37 degrees C water bath. For DNA transfer tests, plasmids coding for green fluorescent protein (GFP) were added to the medium, and GFP expression was assessed by flow cytometry after 2 days. In separate tests, cell killing was determined immediately after treatment. GFP-positive cell counts were 0.4% (0.7% SD) for shams and 3.7% (1.2% SD) of cells for exposure at 2.3 MPa with 2% Optison contrast agent. The fraction of dead cells was 3.4% (1.7% SD) in shams and 28.6% (6.3% SD) in exposed chambers. Both effects increased for increasing Optison concentration and increasing peak rarefactional pressure amplitude. Contrast-aided diagnostic US has a potential therapeutic application for gene transfer, but a trade-off appears to exist with cell killing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12749930     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(02)00783-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  10 in total

Review 1.  Contrast-enhanced and targeted ultrasound.

Authors:  Michiel Postema; Odd Helge Gilja
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Ultrasound-biophysics mechanisms.

Authors:  William D O'Brien
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 3.667

3.  Safety and bio-effects of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Gail ter Haar
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Study on the multidrug resistance 1 gene transfection efficiency using adenovirus vector enhanced by ultrasonic microbubbles in vitro.

Authors:  Zhenhua Guo; Siqi Hong; Xianqing Jin; Qing Luo; Zhigang Wang; Yi Wang
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.695

5.  Localized ultrasound enhances delivery of rapamycin from microbubbles to prevent smooth muscle proliferation.

Authors:  Linsey C Phillips; Alexander L Klibanov; Brian R Wamhoff; John A Hossack
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 9.776

6.  Targeted gene transfection from microbubbles into vascular smooth muscle cells using focused, ultrasound-mediated delivery.

Authors:  Linsey C Phillips; Alexander L Klibanov; Brian R Wamhoff; John A Hossack
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Examination of inertial cavitation of Optison in producing sonoporation of chinese hamster ovary cells.

Authors:  Monica M Forbes; Ryan L Steinberg; William D O'Brien
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 8.  Nanoparticle delivery enhancement with acoustically activated microbubbles.

Authors:  Lee B Mullin; Linsey C Phillips; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Effects of ultrasound and ultrasound contrast agent on vascular tissue.

Authors:  Steven C Wood; Sible Antony; Ronald P Brown; Jin Chen; Edward A Gordon; Victoria M Hitchins; Qin Zhang; Yunbo Liu; Subha Maruvada; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 2.062

10.  pH- and acoustic-responsive platforms based on perfluoropentane-loaded protein nanoparticles for ovarian tumor-targeted ultrasound imaging and therapy.

Authors:  Jianping Li; Hong Ji; Yong Jing; Shiguang Wang
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.703

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.