Literature DB >> 12746637

Accuracy of the continuous glucose monitoring system in inpatient and outpatient conditions.

C Djakouré-Platonoff1, R Radermercker, G Reach, G Slama, J I Selam.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in inpatient and outpatient conditions, using only non-calibration data, the accuracy of the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CG-MS). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Twelve, 21 and 20 type 1 diabetic patients participated in 3- day inhospital, 6-day ambulatory (i.e., 2 sensors worn consecutively) and 3-day ambulatory studies. Capillary glucose tests (7-8/day) served as comparisons. Pairs of data (excluding the 4 daily pairs used automatically by the CGMS for calibrations) were analyzed using correlation coefficient, error -grid analysis, and mean of absolute differences.
RESULTS: Two third and half of the sensing days were qualified as "optimal", i.e., interpretable by the CGMS program in the inpatient and outpatient studies, respectively. Correlation coefficient was 0.92, 0.81 and 0.73 in the inpatient, 6 day outpatient and 3-day outpatient studies. 98%, 93% and 96% of the data fell in the A or B error-grid "clinically acceptable" zones. Mean absolute differences between sensor and glucometer values were 25 +/- 2, 34 +/- 5 and 32 +/- 5 mg/dl.
CONCLUSION: CGMS may be used for assessment of glycemic trends, though accuracy is more in the range of glucometers than of laboratory tests. Inhospital utilisation improved accuracy and 6-day rather than 3-day sessions may be more appropriate to evaluate day to day reproducibility of glucose profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12746637     DOI: 10.1016/S1262-3636(07)70023-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab        ISSN: 1262-3636            Impact factor:   6.041


  15 in total

1.  Effect of short-term use of a continuous glucose monitoring system with a real-time glucose display and a low glucose alarm on incidence and duration of hypoglycemia in a home setting in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Raymond J Davey; Timothy W Jones; Paul A Fournier
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-01

2.  Impact of shock requiring norepinephrine on the accuracy and reliability of subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Ulrike Holzinger; Joanna Warszawska; Reinhard Kitzberger; Harald Herkner; Philipp G H Metnitz; Christian Madl
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Blood-induced interference of glucose sensor function in vitro: implications for in vivo sensor function.

Authors:  Ulrike Klueh; Zenghe Liu; Tianmei Ouyang; Brian Cho; Ben Feldman; Timothy P Henning; Don Kreutzer
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-11

4.  Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in the clinical setting: the good, the bad, and the practical.

Authors:  Irene Mamkin; Svetlana Ten; Sonal Bhandari; Neesha Ramchandani
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-09

5.  Recent advances in continuous glucose monitoring: biocompatibility of glucose sensors for implantation in subcutis.

Authors:  Peter H Kvist; Henrik E Jensen
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-09

6.  The correlation of hemoglobin A1c to blood glucose.

Authors:  Ken Sikaris
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-05-01

7.  A review of the management of implanted medical devices for diabetes: trends and directions.

Authors:  Carl Edman; Darrel Drinan
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11

8.  Inflammation and glucose sensors: use of dexamethasone to extend glucose sensor function and life span in vivo.

Authors:  Ulrike Klueh; Manjot Kaur; David C Montrose; Donald L Kreutzer
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-07

9.  Metabolic biofouling of glucose sensors in vivo: role of tissue microhemorrhages.

Authors:  Ulrike Klueh; Zenghe Liu; Ben Feldman; Timothy P Henning; Brian Cho; Tianmei Ouyang; Don Kreutzer
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-01

10.  Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in critically ill patients: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Ulrike Holzinger; Joanna Warszawska; Reinhard Kitzberger; Marlene Wewalka; Wolfgang Miehsler; Harald Herkner; Christian Madl
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.