Literature DB >> 12746440

Functional distinctions between IMP dehydrogenase genes in providing mycophenolate resistance and guanine prototrophy to yeast.

Judith W Hyle1, Randal J Shaw, Daniel Reines.   

Abstract

IMP dehydrogenase (IMPDH) catalyzes the rate-limiting step in the de novo synthesis of GTP. Yeast with mutations in the transcription elongation machinery are sensitive to inhibitors of this enzyme such as 6-azauracil and mycophenolic acid, at least partly because of their inability to transcriptionally induce IMPDH. To understand the molecular basis of this drug-sensitive phenotype, we have dissected the expression and function of a four-gene family in yeast called IMD1 through IMD4. We show here that these family members are distinct, despite a high degree of amino acid identity between the proteins they encode. Extrachromosomal copies of IMD1, IMD3, or IMD4 could not rescue the drug-sensitive phenotype of IMD2 deletants. When overexpressed, IMD3 or IMD4 weakly compensated for deletion of IMD2. IMD1 is transcriptionally silent and bears critical amino acid substitutions compared with IMD2 that destroy its function, offering strong evidence that it is a pseudogene. The simultaneous deletion of all four IMD genes was lethal unless growth media were supplemented with guanine. This suggests that there are no other essential functions of the IMPDH homologs aside from IMP dehydrogenase activity. Although neither IMD3 nor IMD4 could confer drug resistance to cells lacking IMD2, either alone was sufficient to confer guanine prototrophy. The special function of IMD2 was provided by its ability to be transcriptionally induced and the probable intrinsic drug resistance of its enzymatic activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12746440      PMCID: PMC3367515          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M303736200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  39 in total

Review 1.  Transcription elongation factor SII.

Authors:  M Wind; D Reines
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Regulation of an IMP dehydrogenase gene and its overexpression in drug-sensitive transcription elongation mutants of yeast.

Authors:  R J Shaw; J L Wilson; K T Smith; D Reines
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Analysing gene function after duplication.

Authors:  T Massingham; L J Davies; P Liò
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.345

4.  Systematic analysis of S. cerevisiae chromosome VIII genes.

Authors:  R Niedenthal; L Riles; U Güldener; S Klein; M Johnston; J H Hegemann
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.239

5.  Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis.

Authors:  E A Winzeler; D D Shoemaker; A Astromoff; H Liang; K Anderson; B Andre; R Bangham; R Benito; J D Boeke; H Bussey; A M Chu; C Connelly; K Davis; F Dietrich; S W Dow; M El Bakkoury; F Foury; S H Friend; E Gentalen; G Giaever; J H Hegemann; T Jones; M Laub; H Liao; N Liebundguth; D J Lockhart; A Lucau-Danila; M Lussier; N M'Rabet; P Menard; M Mittmann; C Pai; C Rebischung; J L Revuelta; L Riles; C J Roberts; P Ross-MacDonald; B Scherens; M Snyder; S Sookhai-Mahadeo; R K Storms; S Véronneau; M Voet; G Volckaert; T R Ward; R Wysocki; G S Yen; K Yu; K Zimmermann; P Philippsen; M Johnston; R W Davis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-08-06       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Inhibition of T lymphocyte activation in mice heterozygous for loss of the IMPDH II gene.

Authors:  J J Gu; S Stegmann; K Gathy; R Murray; J Laliberte; L Ayscue; B S Mitchell
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Screening the yeast "disruptome" for mutants affecting resistance to the immunosuppressive drug, mycophenolic acid.

Authors:  Christine Desmoucelles; Benoit Pinson; Christelle Saint-Marc; Bertrand Daignan-Fornier
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-05-16       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcription elongation mutants are defective in PUR5 induction in response to nucleotide depletion.

Authors:  R J Shaw; D Reines
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  The 19S regulatory particle of the proteasome is required for efficient transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II.

Authors:  A Ferdous; F Gonzalez; L Sun; T Kodadek; S A Johnston
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Transcriptional regulation of the yeast gmp synthesis pathway by its end products.

Authors:  M Escobar-Henriques; B Daignan-Fornier
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-01-12       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  39 in total

1.  Telomeric silencing of an open reading frame in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Arnold B Barton; David B Kaback
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Evidence that the transcription elongation function of Rpb9 is involved in transcription-coupled DNA repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Shisheng Li; Baojin Ding; Runqiang Chen; Christine Ruggiero; Xuefeng Chen
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Amyloid-like assembly of the low complexity domain of yeast Nab3.

Authors:  Thomas W O'Rourke; Travis J Loya; PamelaSara E Head; John R Horton; Daniel Reines
Journal:  Prion       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.931

Review 4.  Basic mechanisms of RNA polymerase II activity and alteration of gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Craig D Kaplan
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-09-26

5.  A novel domain in Set2 mediates RNA polymerase II interaction and couples histone H3 K36 methylation with transcript elongation.

Authors:  Kelby O Kizer; Hemali P Phatnani; Yoichiro Shibata; Hana Hall; Arno L Greenleaf; Brian D Strahl
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Balanced production of ribosome components is required for proper G1/S transition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Fernando Gómez-Herreros; Olga Rodríguez-Galán; Macarena Morillo-Huesca; Douglas Maya; María Arista-Romero; Jesús de la Cruz; Sebastián Chávez; Mari Cruz Muñoz-Centeno
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Detection of the mycophenolate-inhibited form of IMP dehydrogenase in vivo.

Authors:  Christine C McPhillips; Judith W Hyle; Daniel Reines
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Accumulation of unstable promoter-associated transcripts upon loss of the nuclear exosome subunit Rrp6p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Carrie Anne Davis; Manuel Ares
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Properties of an intergenic terminator and start site switch that regulate IMD2 transcription in yeast.

Authors:  M Harley Jenks; Thomas W O'Rourke; Daniel Reines
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Rpb1 sumoylation in response to UV radiation or transcriptional impairment in yeast.

Authors:  Xuefeng Chen; Baojin Ding; Danielle LeJeune; Christine Ruggiero; Shisheng Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.