Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Prospective randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia mesh repair: five year follow up.

× No keyword cloud information.

4 in total

Review 1. Laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:
Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 6.939

2. Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:
Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 12.969

3. Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost.

Authors: J Wellwood; M J Sculpher; D Stoker; G J Nicholls; C Geddes; A Whitehead; R Singh; D Spiegelhalter
Journal: BMJ Date: 1998-07-11

4. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: randomised prospective trial.

Authors: D L Stoker; D J Spiegelhalter; R Singh; J M Wellwood
Journal: Lancet Date: 1994-05-21 Impact factor: 79.321

4 in total

42 in total

1. Inguinal hernia in the new millennium.

Authors: Jorge Cervantes
Journal: World J Surg Date: 2004-03-17 Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2. Improving outcomes in hernia repair by the use of light meshes--a comparison of different implant constructions based on a critical appraisal of the literature.

Authors: Dirk Weyhe; Orlin Belyaev; Christophe Müller; Kirsten Meurer; Karl-Heinz Bauer; Georgios Papapostolou; Waldemar Uhl
Journal: World J Surg Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3. Laparoscopic vs conventional tension free inguinal herniorrhaphy: 2005 society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) annual meeting debate.

Authors: V Puri; E Felix; R J Fitzgibbons
Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 4.584

4. Discomfort five years after laparoscopic and Shouldice inguinal hernia repair: a randomised trial with 867 patients. A report from the SMIL study group.

Authors: Fritz H Berndsen; U Petersson; D Arvidsson; C-E Leijonmarck; C Rudberg; S Smedberg; A Montgomery
Journal: Hernia Date: 2007-04-18 Impact factor: 4.739

Review 5. The measurement of chronic pain and health-related quality of life following inguinal hernia repair: a review of the literature.

Authors: P van Hanswijck de Jonge; A Lloyd; L Horsfall; R Tan; P J O'Dwyer
Journal: Hernia Date: 2008-08-21 Impact factor: 4.739

6. Comparison of open and laparoscopic preperitoneal repair of groin hernia.

Authors: Jianwen Li; Xin Wang; Xueyi Feng; Yan Gu; Rui Tang
Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-08-23 Impact factor: 4.584

7. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal repair versus open inguinal hernia repair: 20-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors: A Barbaro; H Kanhere; J Bessell; G J Maddern
Journal: Hernia Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 4.739

8. Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors: C G Schmedt; S Sauerland; R Bittner
Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2004-12-02 Impact factor: 4.584

9. A modified laparoscopic hernioplasty (TAPP) is the standard procedure for inguinal and femoral hernias: a retrospective 17-year analysis with 1,123 hernia repairs.

Authors: Werner K J Peitsch
Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 4.584

10. Predicting chronic post-operative pain following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors: K J Dickinson; M Thomas; A S Fawole; P J Lyndon; C M White
Journal: Hernia Date: 2008-07-26 Impact factor: 4.739