STUDY OBJECTIVE: To develop a gentamicin pharmacokinetic population model and once-daily dosing algorithm for neonates younger than 10 days. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label study. SETTING: Neonatal intensive care unit. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-nine neonates prescribed gentamicin. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Gentamicin peak and trough serum concentrations were collected from 139 neonates divided into three groups who were receiving one of the following intravenous 24-hour gentamicin regimens during the first 10 days of life, based on gestational age and birth weight (group 1, < 28 wks, 2.5 mg/kg; group 2, 28-34 wks, 3 mg/kg; and group 3, > 34 wks, 4 mg/kg). A structural model was developed in ADAPT II software using a MAP Bayesian approach. Final population parameter estimates were calculated using iterative two-stage analysis. The median (range) gestational age and birth weight, respectively, were 32 weeks (23-42 wks) and 1.92 kg (0.47-5.00 kg). The final one-compartmental linear model had a median (range) gentamicin total clearance, half-life, and volume of distribution of 0.0709 L/hour (0.0151-0.246 L/hr), 8.59 hours (4.88-16.9 hrs), and 0.262 L (0.0903-0.929 L), respectively. Total clearance increased as gestational age increased (p<0.001). Group 1 (10.2 hrs) had a significantly longer half-life than either group 2 (8.89 hrs, p<0.01) or group 3 (6.98 hrs, p<0.01). Total clearance was associated with gestational age and birth weight: clearance (L/hr) = (0.00504 + [0.00108 x gestational age]) x birth weight (coefficient of determination [r2] = 0.897), and volume of distribution was associated with birth weight (r2 = 0.700). The following dosing algorithm was designed to reach a therapeutic 24-hour area under the curve (87.5 mg/L x hr) in neonates during the first 10 days after birth: 24-hour gentamicin dose (mg) = (0.441 + [0.0945 x gestational age]) x birth weight. CONCLUSION: This dosing algorithm provides a new approach for determining initial gentamicin dosing regimens in neonates; however, clinical validation is required.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To develop a gentamicin pharmacokinetic population model and once-daily dosing algorithm for neonates younger than 10 days. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label study. SETTING: Neonatal intensive care unit. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-nine neonates prescribed gentamicin. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Gentamicin peak and trough serum concentrations were collected from 139 neonates divided into three groups who were receiving one of the following intravenous 24-hour gentamicin regimens during the first 10 days of life, based on gestational age and birth weight (group 1, < 28 wks, 2.5 mg/kg; group 2, 28-34 wks, 3 mg/kg; and group 3, > 34 wks, 4 mg/kg). A structural model was developed in ADAPT II software using a MAP Bayesian approach. Final population parameter estimates were calculated using iterative two-stage analysis. The median (range) gestational age and birth weight, respectively, were 32 weeks (23-42 wks) and 1.92 kg (0.47-5.00 kg). The final one-compartmental linear model had a median (range) gentamicin total clearance, half-life, and volume of distribution of 0.0709 L/hour (0.0151-0.246 L/hr), 8.59 hours (4.88-16.9 hrs), and 0.262 L (0.0903-0.929 L), respectively. Total clearance increased as gestational age increased (p<0.001). Group 1 (10.2 hrs) had a significantly longer half-life than either group 2 (8.89 hrs, p<0.01) or group 3 (6.98 hrs, p<0.01). Total clearance was associated with gestational age and birth weight: clearance (L/hr) = (0.00504 + [0.00108 x gestational age]) x birth weight (coefficient of determination [r2] = 0.897), and volume of distribution was associated with birth weight (r2 = 0.700). The following dosing algorithm was designed to reach a therapeutic 24-hour area under the curve (87.5 mg/L x hr) in neonates during the first 10 days after birth: 24-hour gentamicin dose (mg) = (0.441 + [0.0945 x gestational age]) x birth weight. CONCLUSION: This dosing algorithm provides a new approach for determining initial gentamicin dosing regimens in neonates; however, clinical validation is required.
Authors: Julie Autmizguine; Daniel K Benjamin; P Brian Smith; Mario Sampson; Philippe Ovetchkine; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez; Kevin M Watt Journal: Curr Clin Pharmacol Date: 2014
Authors: Enno D Wildschut; Annewil van Saet; Pavla Pokorna; Maurice J Ahsman; John N Van den Anker; Dick Tibboel Journal: Pediatr Clin North Am Date: 2012-08-29 Impact factor: 3.278
Authors: Chris Stockmann; Michael G Spigarelli; Sarah C Campbell; Jonathan E Constance; Joshua D Courter; Emily A Thorell; Jared Olson; Catherine M T Sherwin Journal: Paediatr Drugs Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 3.022
Authors: Elisabet I Nielsen; Marie Sandström; Per Hartvig Honoré; Uwe Ewald; Lena E Friberg Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2009 Impact factor: 6.447