Yee Shan Low1, Sin Li Tan1, Angeline Sl Wan2. 1. Department of Pharmacy, Sultanah Fatimah Specialist Hospital, Muar, Johor. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Sultanah Fatimah Specialist Hospital, Muar, Johor.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of extended-interval gentamicin dosing practiced in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and special care nursery (SCN) of a Malaysian hospital. METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study with pharmacokinetic analysis of all patients aged ≤28 days who received gentamicin treatment in NICU/SCN. Subjects received dosing according to a regimen modified from an Australian-based pediatric guideline. During a study period of 3 months, subjects were evaluated for gestational age, body weight, serum creatinine concentration, gentamicin dose/interval, serum peak and trough concentrations, and pharmacokinetic parameters. Descriptive percentages were used to determine the overall dosing accuracy, while analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to compare the accuracy rates among different gestational ages. Pharmacokinetic profile among different gestational age and body weight groups were compared by using ANOVA. RESULTS: Of the 113 subjects included, 82.3% (n = 93) achieved therapeutic concentrations at the first drug-monitoring assessment. There was no significant difference found between the percentage of term neonates who achieved therapeutic concentrations and the premature group (87.1% vs. 74.4%), p = 0.085. A total of 112 subjects (99.1%) achieved desired therapeutic trough concentration of <2 mg/L. Mean gentamicin peak concentration was 8.52 mg/L (95% confidence interval [Cl], 8.13-8.90 mg/L) and trough concentration was 0.54 mg/L (95% CI, 0.48-0.60 mg/L). Mean volume of distribution, half-life, and elimination rate were 0.65 L/kg (95% CI, 0.62-0.68 L/kg), 6.96 hours (95% CI, 6.52-7.40 hours), and 0.11 hour(-1) (95% CI, 0.10-0.11 hour(-1)), respectively. CONCLUSION: The larger percentage of subjects attaining therapeutic range with extended-interval gentamicin dosing suggests that this regimen is appropriate and can be safely used among Malaysian neonates.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of extended-interval gentamicin dosing practiced in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and special care nursery (SCN) of a Malaysian hospital. METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study with pharmacokinetic analysis of all patients aged ≤28 days who received gentamicin treatment in NICU/SCN. Subjects received dosing according to a regimen modified from an Australian-based pediatric guideline. During a study period of 3 months, subjects were evaluated for gestational age, body weight, serum creatinine concentration, gentamicin dose/interval, serum peak and trough concentrations, and pharmacokinetic parameters. Descriptive percentages were used to determine the overall dosing accuracy, while analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to compare the accuracy rates among different gestational ages. Pharmacokinetic profile among different gestational age and body weight groups were compared by using ANOVA. RESULTS: Of the 113 subjects included, 82.3% (n = 93) achieved therapeutic concentrations at the first drug-monitoring assessment. There was no significant difference found between the percentage of term neonates who achieved therapeutic concentrations and the premature group (87.1% vs. 74.4%), p = 0.085. A total of 112 subjects (99.1%) achieved desired therapeutic trough concentration of <2 mg/L. Mean gentamicin peak concentration was 8.52 mg/L (95% confidence interval [Cl], 8.13-8.90 mg/L) and trough concentration was 0.54 mg/L (95% CI, 0.48-0.60 mg/L). Mean volume of distribution, half-life, and elimination rate were 0.65 L/kg (95% CI, 0.62-0.68 L/kg), 6.96 hours (95% CI, 6.52-7.40 hours), and 0.11 hour(-1) (95% CI, 0.10-0.11 hour(-1)), respectively. CONCLUSION: The larger percentage of subjects attaining therapeutic range with extended-interval gentamicin dosing suggests that this regimen is appropriate and can be safely used among Malaysian neonates.
Authors: Despina G Contopoulos-Ioannidis; Nikos D Giotis; Dimitra V Baliatsa; John P A Ioannidis Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: David S Hoff; Roger A Wilcox; Lisa M Tollefson; Polina G Lipnik; Amy R Commers; Meixia Liu Journal: Pharmacotherapy Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 4.705
Authors: A R Beaubien; E Ormsby; A Bayne; K Carrier; G Crossfield; M Downes; R Henri; M Hodgen Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 1991-06 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: M Monir Hossain; Nazma A Chowdhury; Mahfuza Shirin; Samir K Saha; Mary Miller-Bell; David Edwards; Jacob Aranda; Patricia Coffey; Gary L Darmstadt Journal: J Health Popul Nutr Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Caspar J Hodiamont; Annemieke K van den Broek; Suzanne L de Vroom; Jan M Prins; Ron A A Mathôt; Reinier M van Hest Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 5.577
Authors: Kristin O'Connor; Mark W Davies; Pieter Koorts; David W Cartwright; Karen Whitfield Journal: Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet Date: 2021-08-09 Impact factor: 2.441