AIM: To investigate the effect of sepsis upon the volume of distribution (Vd) of gentamicin in neonates. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of neonates admitted to Dunedin Hospital who had gentamicin concentrations performed between 1st January 2000 and 30th October 2003. Data from 277 neonates, including a total of 576 gentamicin concentrations, were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis. Fifteen (5.4%) of the neonates had confirmed sepsis. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed with NONMEM using a one compartment first order elimination model. Duration of infusion (D) was included as a parameter in the model. Covariates included sepsis (SEP), chronological age, gestational age (GA), birth weight, current weight, gender, Apgar score at 1 (AP1) and 5 (AP2) minutes, plasma C-reactive protein and serum creatinine. RESULTS: The initial model provided a mean estimates of clearance (CL) of 0.0460 l kg(-1) h(-1), volume of distribution (Vd) of 0.483 l kg(-1) and D of 0.748 h. The magnitudes of interpatient variability, expressed as CV%, were 29.2% for CL, 20.8% for Vd and 71.5% for D. The magnitude of residual variability in gentamicin concentrations was 88.0%. The final pharmacokinetic model was: CL = (0.0177 + 0.00147.(GA-20) + 0.000635.AP2) l kg(-1) h(-1), Vd = (0.483 +0.0656. sepsis) l kg(-1), D = 0.672 h. The interpatient variability (CV%) was 22.8% for CL, 22.8% for Vd and 97.7% for D. The magnitude of residual variability in gentamicin concentrations was 83.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The 14% increase in Vd in septic neonates implies that larger doses may be required to achieve peak therapeutic concentrations in the presence of sepsis. D is an important parameter in neonatal pharmacokinetic models.
AIM: To investigate the effect of sepsis upon the volume of distribution (Vd) of gentamicin in neonates. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of neonates admitted to Dunedin Hospital who had gentamicin concentrations performed between 1st January 2000 and 30th October 2003. Data from 277 neonates, including a total of 576 gentamicin concentrations, were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis. Fifteen (5.4%) of the neonates had confirmed sepsis. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed with NONMEM using a one compartment first order elimination model. Duration of infusion (D) was included as a parameter in the model. Covariates included sepsis (SEP), chronological age, gestational age (GA), birth weight, current weight, gender, Apgar score at 1 (AP1) and 5 (AP2) minutes, plasma C-reactive protein and serum creatinine. RESULTS: The initial model provided a mean estimates of clearance (CL) of 0.0460 l kg(-1) h(-1), volume of distribution (Vd) of 0.483 l kg(-1) and D of 0.748 h. The magnitudes of interpatient variability, expressed as CV%, were 29.2% for CL, 20.8% for Vd and 71.5% for D. The magnitude of residual variability in gentamicin concentrations was 88.0%. The final pharmacokinetic model was: CL = (0.0177 + 0.00147.(GA-20) + 0.000635.AP2) l kg(-1) h(-1), Vd = (0.483 +0.0656. sepsis) l kg(-1), D = 0.672 h. The interpatient variability (CV%) was 22.8% for CL, 22.8% for Vd and 97.7% for D. The magnitude of residual variability in gentamicin concentrations was 83.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The 14% increase in Vd in septic neonates implies that larger doses may be required to achieve peak therapeutic concentrations in the presence of sepsis. D is an important parameter in neonatal pharmacokinetic models.
Authors: K C Hayani; F K Hatzopoulos; A L Frank; M R Thummala; M J Hantsch; B M Schatz; E G John; D Vidyasagar Journal: J Pediatr Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Catherine M T Sherwin; Sofia Svahn; Antje Van der Linden; Roland S Broadbent; Natalie J Medlicott; David M Reith Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2009-03-21 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Tamara van Donge; Marc Pfister; Julia Bielicki; Chantal Csajka; Frederique Rodieux; John van den Anker; Aline Fuchs Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Brian J Anderson; Karel Allegaert; John N Van den Anker; Veerle Cossey; Nicholas H G Holford Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2006-07-21 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Jessica K Roberts; Chris Stockmann; Jonathan E Constance; Justin Stiers; Michael G Spigarelli; Robert M Ward; Catherine M T Sherwin Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: A Smits; R F W De Cock; K Allegaert; S Vanhaesebrouck; M Danhof; C A J Knibbe Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-07-27 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Eva Germovsek; Alison Kent; Tuuli Metsvaht; Irja Lutsar; Nigel Klein; Mark A Turner; Mike Sharland; Elisabet I Nielsen; Paul T Heath; Joseph F Standing Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 5.191