Literature DB >> 10423188

Intracranial ERPs in humans during a lateralized visual oddball task: II. Temporal, parietal, and frontal recordings.

J M Clarke1, E Halgren, P Chauvel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the relative participation of each cerebral hemisphere during a lateralized task that can be performed by a single hemisphere. While our companion article ( Clarke et al. 1999) focused on visual and motor event-related potentials (ERPs) recorded from occipital and peri-Rolandic sites, the present article is concerned with ERP correlates of intermediate stages of information processing from remaining cerebral regions.
METHODS: Intracranial ERPs were recorded from temporal, parietal and frontal lobe sites in 13 patients with intractable epilepsy while they performed a lateralized visual oddball task.
RESULTS: Visually-responsive N2 and/or P3 effects were recorded from medial temporal and supramarginal sites that appear to reflect activity along ventral and dorsal visual streams, respectively. Likewise, certain prefrontal sites, that are probably involved in working memory, were also visually-responsive. The majority of sites exhibiting N2, P3 and/or slow wave components, however, were unaffected by lateralized visual field or response hand effects. Target-evoked P3-like components were most frequently recorded from medial temporal and prefrontal sites. Post-response slow wave components were pervasive, and polarity reversals were present in the insula/operculum region, apparently reflecting somatosensory activity from SII.
CONCLUSIONS: The general absence of lateralized ERP effects despite lateralized stimulus input and response output suggests the importance of interhemispheric integration over hemispheric independence in the processing of this type of task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10423188     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00064-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  11 in total

1.  Reproducibility of the hemodynamic response to auditory oddball stimuli: a six-week test-retest study.

Authors:  Kent A Kiehl; Peter F Liddle
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Changes in the somatosensory N250 and P300 by the variation of reaction time.

Authors:  Tetsuo Kida; Yoshiaki Nishihira; Arihiro Hatta; Toshiaki Wasaka; Hiroki Nakata; Masanori Sakamoto; Tsuyoshi Nakajima
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  On the neurodynamics of the creation of consciousness.

Authors:  J G Taylor
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Abnormal hemodynamics in schizophrenia during an auditory oddball task.

Authors:  Kent A Kiehl; Michael C Stevens; Kim Celone; Matthew Kurtz; John H Krystal
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 13.382

5.  Signals from intraventricular depth electrodes can control a brain-computer interface.

Authors:  Jerry J Shih; Dean J Krusienski
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Sequential temporo-fronto-temporal activation during monitoring of the auditory environment for temporal patterns.

Authors:  Eric Halgren; Jason Sherfey; Andrei Irimia; Anders M Dale; Ksenija Marinkovic
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Hemispheric differences in auditory oddball responses during monaural versus binaural stimulation.

Authors:  Casey S Gilmore; Brett A Clementz; Patrick Berg
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.997

8.  Do resting brain dynamics predict oddball evoked-potential?

Authors:  Tien-Wen Lee; Younger W-Y Yu; Hung-Chi Wu; Tai-Jui Chen
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Brain dynamics underlying the nonlinear threshold for access to consciousness.

Authors:  Antoine Del Cul; Sylvain Baillet; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Suggested deafness during hypnosis and simulation of hypnosis compared to a distraction and control condition: A study on subjective experience and cortical brain responses.

Authors:  Marcel Franz; Barbara Schmidt; Holger Hecht; Ewald Naumann; Wolfgang H R Miltner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.