Literature DB >> 17054253

Strontium ranelate for preventing and treating postmenopausal osteoporosis.

S O'Donnell1, A Cranney, G A Wells, J D Adachi, J Y Reginster.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Strontium ranelate is a new treatment for osteoporosis therefore, its benefits and harms need to be known.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of strontium ranelate for the treatment and prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE (1996 to March 2005), EMBASE (1996 to week 9 2005), the Cochrane Library (1996 to Issue 1 2005), reference lists of relevant articles and conference proceedings from the last two years. Additional data was sought from authors. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of at least one year duration comparing strontium ranelate versus placebo reporting fracture incidence, bone mineral density (BMD), health related quality of life or safety in postmenopausal women. Treatment (versus prevention) population was defined as women with prevalent vertebral fractures and/or lumbar spine BMD T score < -2.5 SD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently determined study eligibility, assessed trial quality and extracted the relevant data. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. RCTs were grouped by dose of strontium ranelate and treatment duration. Where possible, meta-analysis was conducted using the random effects model. MAIN
RESULTS: Four trials met the inclusion criteria. Three included a treatment population (0.5 to 2 g of strontium ranelate daily) and one a prevention population (0.125 g, 0.5 g and 1 g daily). A 37% reduction in vertebral fractures (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.56, 0.71) and a 14% reduction in non-vertebral fractures (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75, 0.98) were demonstrated over three years with 2 g of strontium ranelate daily in a treatment population. An increase in BMD was shown at all BMD sites after two to three years in both populations. Lower doses of strontium ranelate were superior to placebo and the highest dose demonstrated the greatest reduction in vertebral fractures and increase in BMD. An increased risk of diarrhea with 2 g of strontium ranelate was found; however, adverse events did not affect the risk of discontinuing treatment nor did it increase the risk of serious side effects, gastritis or death. Additional data suggests that the risk of vascular and nervous system side-effects is slightly increased with taking 2 g of strontium ranelate daily over three to four years. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: There is silver level evidence (www.cochranemsk.org) to support the efficacy of strontium ranelate for the reduction of fractures (vertebral and to a lesser extent non-vertebral) in postmenopausal osteoporotic women and an increase in BMD in postmenopausal women with/without osteoporosis. Diarrhea may occur however, adverse events leading to study withdrawal were not significantly increased with taking 2 g of strontium ranelate daily. Potential vascular and neurological side-effects need to be further explored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17054253      PMCID: PMC8092570          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005326.pub3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  52 in total

Review 1.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson; Jonathan J Deeks; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-06

2.  Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?

Authors:  A R Jadad; R A Moore; D Carroll; C Jenkinson; D J Reynolds; D J Gavaghan; H J McQuay
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1996-02

Review 3.  The statistical basis of meta-analysis.

Authors:  J L Fleiss
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 4.  Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Risk of mortality following clinical fractures.

Authors:  J A Cauley; D E Thompson; K C Ensrud; J C Scott; D Black
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  An estimate of the worldwide prevalence, mortality and disability associated with hip fracture.

Authors:  O Johnell; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  [Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in 2004].

Authors:  J Y Reginster; J P Devogelaer
Journal:  Rev Med Liege       Date:  2004-11

8.  [Bone mineralization and mineral status].

Authors:  Georges Boivin
Journal:  Therapie       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.070

9.  Design and methodology of the phase 3 trials for the clinical development of strontium ranelate in the treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  P J Meunier; J Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Perspective. How many women have osteoporosis?

Authors:  L J Melton; E A Chrischilles; C Cooper; A W Lane; B L Riggs
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  12 in total

1.  Should we really compare absolute risk reduction in different trials on osteoporosis: comment on the article by Ringe JD and Doherty JG.

Authors:  Zhanna E Belaya
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 2.  Current, new and future treatments of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Pooneh Salari Sharif; Mohammad Abdollahi; Bagher Larijani
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Prevalent and Emerging Therapies for Osteoporosis.

Authors:  K S Brar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

4.  Influence of strontium for calcium substitution in bioactive glasses on degradation, ion release and apatite formation.

Authors:  Yann C Fredholm; Natalia Karpukhina; Delia S Brauer; Julian R Jones; Robert V Law; Robert G Hill
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  Bioactive Chitosan-Based Organometallic Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering and Regeneration.

Authors:  Solmaz Zakhireh; Jaleh Barar; Khosro Adibkia; Younes Beygi-Khosrowshahi; Marziyeh Fathi; Hossein Omidain; Yadollah Omidi
Journal:  Top Curr Chem (Cham)       Date:  2022-02-12

6.  Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews - are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders?

Authors:  Thomas Aagaard; Hans Lund; Carsten Juhl
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 7.  New horizons in treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ozra Tabatabaei-Malazy; Pooneh Salari; Patricia Khashayar; Bagher Larijani
Journal:  Daru       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Digital X-ray radiogrammetry of hand or wrist radiographs can predict hip fracture risk--a study in 5,420 women and 2,837 men.

Authors:  M L Wilczek; J Kälvesten; J Algulin; O Beiki; T B Brismar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Clinical challenges in the management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Sheryl F Vondracek; Paul Minne; Michael T McDermott
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 10.  The future of osteoarthritis therapeutics: targeted pharmacological therapy.

Authors:  A Mobasheri
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.592

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.