Literature DB >> 12728431

Observations on retrieved glenoid components.

Ralph Hertel1, F T Ballmer.   

Abstract

To obtain more information on the pattern of damage of prosthetic glenoid components, we analyzed 7 retrieved glenoid components. The consecutive series included 2 standard polyethylene components and 5 highly crystalline polyethylene glenoids (Hylamer; DePuy Dupont Orthopaedics, Warsaw, IN) retrieved 3 to 12 years after implantation. At revision, 4 of 5 Hylamer components were fractured. Common wear patterns were i) deformation and crumbling of the rim, particularly at the inferior hemicircumference, probably caused by direct contact of the humerus with the prosthetic component; ii) roughening (abrasion and scratching) of the adjacent articulating surface; and iii) concentric and congruous wear centered posteriorly. Available glenoid components may cover an excessive sector of the head. This can result in mechanical restriction of glenohumeral motion and abutment of the humerus against the glenoid rim. Abutment may cause major shear forces and therefore cause glenoid loosening. The value of articular surface mismatch is questionable because retrieved glenoids were worn to a conforming joint. Copyright 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12728431     DOI: 10.1054/arth.2003.50048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  7 in total

1.  Correlation between radiographic risk for glenoid component loosening and clinical scores in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Fabrizio Campi; Paolo Paladini; Nicola Lollino; Francesco Fauci; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2009-04

2.  A pictographic atlas for classifying damage modes on polyethylene bearings.

Authors:  Melinda Harman; Luca Cristofolini; Paolo Erani; Susanna Stea; Marco Viceconti
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Computational analysis of polyethylene wear in anatomical and reverse shoulder prostheses.

Authors:  C Quental; J Folgado; P R Fernandes; J Monteiro
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Evaluation of a reconstruction reverse shoulder for tumour surgery and tribological comparision with an anatomical shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ralf Dieckmann; Dennis Liem; Georg Gosheger; Marcel-Philipp Henrichs; Steffen Höll; Jendrik Hardes; Arne Streitbürger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Wear performance of inverted non-conforming bearings in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lorenzo Banci; Alessio Meoli; Martin Hintner; Hans Rudolf Bloch
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-02-07

6.  Failure mechanism of the all-polyethylene glenoid implant.

Authors:  Junaid Sarah; Gupta Sanjay; Sanghavi Sanjay; Anglin Carolyn; Roger Emery; Amis Andrew; Hansen Ulrich
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Anatomic variations in glenohumeral joint: an interpopulation study.

Authors:  Roopam Dey; Steven Roche; Theo Rosch; Tinashe Mutsvangwa; Johan Charilaou; Sudesh Sivarasu
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2018-02-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.