Literature DB >> 12722805

Head scatter off-axis for megavoltage x rays.

Timothy C Zhu1, Bengt E Bjärngard.   

Abstract

Our objective in this study has been to investigate how head scatter varies with the off-axis position in a 6 MV x-ray beam. We define the head-scatter off-axis ratio, HOA, as the ratio of the kerma due to head-scatter photons at the off-axis position x to the kerma from direct primary photons on the central axis. "Direct primary" are those photons that come from the source without interactions in the intervening structures. We determined HOA from measurements with an ionization chamber in a miniphantom. Head-scatter and direct primary photons contribute to a measurement of the ionization per mu Q(x) at the off-axis position x in the open field cx x cy. The ionization per mu QP(x), measured in the same position but with the field collimated to the smallest possible opening (cx x 3 cm), is intended to include only direct primary photons. Head-scatter photons cannot be completely eliminated, and the errors due to remaining head scatter and radiation back-scattered by the movable collimators into the monitor were estimated. For normalization of the final results, ionization due to direct primary photons was also measured on the central axis, QP(0). HOA was derived from these three measurements as HOA(cx,cy,x)=(Q(cx,cy,x) - QP(cx,cy,x))/QP(cx,cy,0). On the central axis (x=y=0), HOA represents the "scatter-to-primary ratio" between head scatter and the direct primary dose. Monte Carlo simulations were made to help with the interpretation and evaluation of the results. HOA could be fitted to a Gaussian model with two components corresponding to sources of widths 1.8 and 14 cm, projected on a plane 5 cm below the x-ray source. The narrow Gaussian component is interpreted as the source of photons scattered in the flattening filter and the primary collimator. The broad component is attributed to photons scattered in the secondary (variable) collimators. Conventional head-scatter models (e.g., a single Gaussian source model) do not fit the measured HOA data for large collimator settings (c>20 cm) or outside beam collimation. The full width at half-maximum (FWHM) of HOA(x) across the field increased with the field width (cx) in the direction of the measurements in a manner consistent with the field of view of the two sources. It was not sensitive to the field measure in the orthogonal direction (cy). Head scatter outside the field also increased with field size, reflecting an increased contribution of photons scattered at large angles. It exceeds the leakage through the collimator 2 cm outside the edge for square fields c>10 cm. Monte Carlo calculations showed considerably less head scatter outside the field than measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12722805     DOI: 10.1118/1.1556609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  4 in total

1.  Multisource modeling of flattening filter free (FFF) beam and the optimization of model parameters.

Authors:  Woong Cho; Kayla N Kielar; Ed Mok; Lei Xing; Jeong-Hoon Park; Won-Gyun Jung; Tae-Suk Suh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A convolution/superposition method using primary and scatter dose kernels formed for energy bins of X-ray spectra reconstructed as a function of off-axis distance: a theoretical study on 10-MV X-ray dose calculations in thorax-like phantoms.

Authors:  Akira Iwasaki; Shigenobu Kimura; Kohji Sutoh; Kazuo Kamimura; Makoto Sasamori; Fumio Komai; Morio Seino; Singo Terashima; Mamoru Kubota; Junichi Hirota; Yoichiro Hosokawa
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2011-06-15

3.  Monitor unit calculations for external photon and electron beams: Report of the AAPM Therapy Physics Committee Task Group No. 71.

Authors:  John P Gibbons; John A Antolak; David S Followill; M Saiful Huq; Eric E Klein; Kwok L Lam; Jatinder R Palta; Donald M Roback; Mark Reid; Faiz M Khan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Validation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm at extended SSD.

Authors:  Amjad Hussain; Eduardo Villarreal-Barajas; Derek Brown; Peter Dunscombe
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.