Literature DB >> 12721241

Use of genetic testing and prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy in women with breast or ovarian cancer from families with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

Hanne Meijers-Heijboer1, Cecile T M Brekelmans, Marian Menke-Pluymers, Caroline Seynaeve, Astrid Baalbergen, Curt Burger, Ellen Crepin, Ans W M van den Ouweland, Bert van Geel, Jan G M Klijn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the use of genetic testing, prophylactic mastectomy, and oophorectomy among women with breast and/or ovarian cancer from families with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We examined prospectively the use of BRCA1/BRCA2 testing in all women with a primary breast or ovarian cancer from a consecutive series of 112 high-risk families in which a BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation eventually was identified. The rate of prophylactic bilateral and contralateral mastectomy and prophylactic oophorectomy was analyzed in the women who carried a BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation and who had no metastatic disease at the time of the genetic test disclosure. We examined predictors for genetic test uptake and prophylactic surgery using univariate and multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Overall, 192 of 220 women (87%) with primary tumors underwent genetic testing. Eleven of these 192 tested women (6%) appeared not to carry the family-specific BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation. Genetic testing occurred significantly more frequently at ages younger than 50 years (P =.04) and in persons with multiple primary tumors (P =.02). Among eligible women, 35 of 101 (35%) requested bilateral or contralateral mastectomy, and 47 of 95 (49%) requested oophorectomy. Women aged younger than 50 years and women who developed their first tumor after the initial identification of a BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation in the family were significantly (both P =.01) more likely to opt for prophylactic bilateral or contralateral mastectomy.
CONCLUSION: In a clinical setting, we show a high demand for BRCA1/BRCA2 testing and for prophylactic surgery by women with breast and/or ovarian cancer from high-risk families.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12721241     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.09.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  41 in total

1.  Genetic testing for BRCA1: effects of a randomised study of knowledge provision on interest in testing and long term test uptake; implications for the NICE guidelines.

Authors:  Julia Hall; Susan Gray; Roger A'Hern; Susan Shanley; Maggie Watson; Kathryn Kash; Robert Croyle; Rosalind Eeles
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Factors affecting the decision to undergo risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among women with BRCA gene mutation.

Authors:  Dongwon Kim; Eunyoung Kang; Euijun Hwang; Young Sun; Yoonsun Hwang; Cha Kyong Yom; Kidong Kim; Jae Hong No; Yong-Beom Kim; Sung-Won Kim
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Breast Cancer Risk - Genes, Environment and Clinics.

Authors:  P A Fasching; A B Ekici; B R Adamietz; D L Wachter; A Hein; C M Bayer; L Häberle; C R Loehberg; S M Jud; K Heusinger; M Rübner; C Rauh; M R Bani; M P Lux; R Schulz-Wendtland; A Hartmann; M W Beckmann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Predictors and outcomes of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Kristi D Graves; Beth N Peshkin; Chanita H Halbert; Tiffani A DeMarco; Claudine Isaacs; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Opinions of women with high inherited breast cancer risk about prophylactic mastectomy: an initial evaluation from a screening trial including magnetic resonance imaging and ductal lavage.

Authors:  Allison W Kurian; Anne-Renee Hartman; Meredith A Mills; James M Ford; Bruce L Daniel; Sylvia K Plevritis
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 6.  Impact of genetic risk assessment on nutrition-related lifestyle behaviours.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Vernarelli
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 6.297

7.  Female BRCA mutation carriers with a preference for prophylactic mastectomy are more likely to participate an educational-support group and to proceed with the preferred intervention within 2 years.

Authors:  Karin M Landsbergen; Judith B Prins; Yvonne J L Kamm; Han G Brunner; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  BRCA1/2 mutation testing in breast cancer patients: a prospective study of the long-term psychological impact of approach during adjuvant radiotherapy.

Authors:  Kathryn J Schlich-Bakker; Margreet G E M Ausems; Maria Schipper; Herman F J Ten Kroode; Carla C Wárlám-Rodenhuis; Jan van den Bout
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 9.  Genetic counselling and testing for inherited gene mutations in newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer: a review of the existing literature and a proposed research agenda.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Kathy Tucker; Michael Friedlander; Kristine Barlow-Stewart; Elizabeth Lobb; Christobel Saunders; Gillian Mitchell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Tolerability of breast ductal lavage in women from families at high genetic risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer T Loud; Ellen Burke Beckjord; Kathryn Nichols; June Peters; Ruthann Giusti; Mark H Greene
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.