| Literature DB >> 12720575 |
Markus Pfenninger1, David Posada, Frédéric Magnin.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The study of organisms with restricted dispersal abilities and presence in the fossil record is particularly adequate to understand the impact of climate changes on the distribution and genetic structure of species. Trochoidea geyeri (Soós 1926) is a land snail restricted to a patchy, insular distribution in Germany and France. Fossil evidence suggests that current populations of T. geyeri are relicts of a much more widespread distribution during more favourable climatic periods in the Pleistocene.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2003 PMID: 12720575 PMCID: PMC155936 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-3-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
a) Distribution of T. geyeri 16S rDNA and b) ITS-1 haplotypes (columns) at each sampled location (rows).
| a) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 4 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| b) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| n1 | n2 | n3 | n4 | n5 | n6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Figure 3Geographical distribution of 3 and 4-step clades of 16S rDNA variation and inferred events in The font size of the inferences decreases with nesting level.
Sampled populations, abbreviations used, geographical location and number of sampled individuals.
| Population | Abbreviation | Location | Sample size |
| Schlüchtern/Hohenzell | SHZ | 50°21'N 09°33'E | 7 |
| Eisleben/Süβer See | ESS | 51°35'N 11°40'E | 5 |
| Münsingen | MUN | 48°25'N 09°30'E | 8 |
| Mont Ventoux/Sommet | MVS | 44°11'N 05°16'E | 8 |
| Mont Ventoux/Les Rabets | MVR | 44°08'N 05°10'E | 5 |
| Montagne de Lure | ML | 44°07'N 05°28'E | 7 |
| Plateau de Vaucluse | PTV | 43°58'N 05°28'E | 7 |
| Grand Luberon | LUB | 43°49'N 05°28'E | 6 |
| Sainte Victoire | STV | 43°32'N 05°43'E | 5 |
| Chaine des Etoiles | CDE | 43°24'N 05°28'E | 9 |
| Sainte Baume | STB | 43°19'N 05°47'E | 5 |
| Cause de Larzac 1 | LAR1 | 44°00'N 03°20°E | 3 |
| Causse de Larzac 2 | LAR2 | 43°59'N 03°10'E | 5 |
| Causse de Larzac 3 | LAR3 | 44°01'N 03°15'E | 6 |
Figure 2Statistical parsimony network and associated nested design. Statistical parsimony network and associated nested design. Haplotypes are designated by names as defined in table 2. Zeros indicate haplotype states that are necessary intermediates but were not present in the sample. Each line represents a single mutational step connecting two haplotypes. Haplotypes belonging to the same clade level are boxed up to clade level 4-x. Clade level designations are given within each box that contains observed haplotypes. a) Nested cladogram for 16S rDNA and b) for ITS-1 variation.
χ2-test of geographical association of clades and inferences of biological causes for association for the different clades for a) 16S rDNA and b) ITS-1. The inferences were obtained following the newest version of the inference key given in Templeton (1998).
| Clade | χ2 | Inference | |
| Haplotypes nested in 1–8 | 9.000 | 0.008 | Long distance colonisation of MVR from MVS |
| Haplotypes nested in 1–10 | 12.000 | 0.002 | Past fragmentation between PTV and CDE |
| Clades nested in 2–3 | 68.000 | <0.001 | Long distance colonization of STB from Albion area |
| Clades nested in 2–4 | 9.000 | 0.008 | Past fragmentation between PTV and STV |
| Clades nested in 2–7 | 11.700 | 0.043 | Restricted gene-flow with isolation by distance between populations on the Causse de Larzac |
| Clades nested in 2–8 | 15.000 | <0.001 | Long distance colonisation of MUN from SHZ |
| Clades nested in 3–2 | 46.384 | <0.001 | Continuous range expansion with subsequent fragmentation in the Albion area |
| Clades nested in 3–3 | 3.111 | 0.308 | No geographical association of clades |
| Clades nested in 3–4 | 20.000 | <0.001 | Range expansion of southern German populations to ESS, but impossible to discriminate between contiguous range expansion and long distance dispersal |
| Clades nested in 4–1 | 42.000 | <0.001 | Past fragmentation between LUB and all other Provence populations, confirmed by longer than average mutational connection |
| Clades nested in 4–2 | 34.000 | <0.001 | Range expansion, but impossible to discriminate between contiguous range expansion and long distance dispersal from LAR to northern areas |
| Clades in entire cladogram | 77.000 | <0.001 | Range expansion from Provence to Causse de Larzac |
| Clade | χ2 | Inference | |
| Haplotypes nested in 1–2 | 46.000 | <0.001 | Isolation by distance among Provence populations except LUB |
| Haplotypes nested in 1–4 | 20.000 | <0.001 | Inadequate sampling design to discriminate between fragmentation, range expansion or isolation by distance among German populations |
| Clades nested in 2–1 | 52.000 | <0.001 | Past fragmentation of LUB from the rest of the Provence populations |
| Clades nested in 2–2 | 34.000 | <0.000 | Range expansion from the Causse de Larzac to Germany |
| Total cladogram | 86.000 | <0.001 | Contiguous range expansion from Provence to the Causse de Larzac |
Figure 4Past gene-flow estimates among populations inferred from 16S rDNA and ITS-1 in Estimates of 4 Nm >= 0.001 are indicated by arrows.
Figure 1Geographical location of For abbreviations see Table 1.
Nucleotide divergence and clade divergence times estimates Lower half: nucleotide divergence (mean and s.d) among 3-step clades, calculated as changes per site, diagonal: nucleotide diversity (mean ± s.d.) within 3-step clades and upper half: estimated divergence time in million years before present between clades (mean ± s.d.).
| 0.004 ± (0.004) | 0.475 ± (0.119) | 0.823 ± (0.084) | 0.990 ± (0.090) | |
| 0.034 ± (0.007) | 0.011 ± (0.007) | 0.383 ± (0.121) | 0.587 ± (0.123) | |
| 0.051 ± (0.005) | 0.030 ± (0.007) | 0.006 ± (0.005) | 0.180 ± (0.108) | |
| 0.061 ± (0.005) | 0.042 ± (0.007) | 0.016 ± (0.006) | 0.007 ± (0.006) |