Literature DB >> 12719222

Enhanced sampling of the molecular potential energy surface using mutually orthogonal latin squares: application to peptide structures.

K Vengadesan1, N Gautham.   

Abstract

The computational identification of the optimal three-dimensional fold of even a small peptide chain from its sequence, without reference to other known structures, is a complex problem. There have been several attempts at solving this by sampling the potential energy surface of the molecule in a systematic manner. Here we present a new method to carry out the sampling, and to identify low energy conformers of the molecule. The method uses mutually orthogonal Latin squares to select (of the order of) n(2) points from the multidimensional conformation space of size m(n), where n is the number of dimensions (i.e., the number of conformational variables), and m specifies the fineness of the search grid. The sampling is accomplished by first calculating the value of the potential energy function at each one of the selected points. This is followed by analysis of these values of the potential energy to obtain the optimal value for each of the n-variables separately. We show that the set of the n-optimal values obtained in this manner specifies a low energy conformation of the molecule. Repeated application of the method identifies other low energy structures. The computational complexity of this algorithm scales as the fourth power of the size of the molecule. We applied this method to several small peptides, such as the neuropeptide enkephalin, and could identify a set of low energy conformations for each. Many of the structures identified by this method have also been previously identified and characterized by experiment and theory. We also compared the best structures obtained for the tripeptide (Ala)(3) by the present method, with those obtained by an exhaustive grid search, and showed that the algorithm is successful in identifying all the low energy conformers of this molecule.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12719222      PMCID: PMC1302853          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)70017-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  10 in total

1.  Entropic barriers, transition states, funnels, and exponential protein folding kinetics: a simple model.

Authors:  D J Bicout; A Szabo
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Recent improvements in prediction of protein structure by global optimization of a potential energy function.

Authors:  J Pillardy; C Czaplewski; A Liwo; J Lee; D R Ripoll; R Kaźmierkiewicz; S Oldziej; W J Wedemeyer; K D Gibson; Y A Arnautova; J Saunders; Y J Ye; H A Scheraga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Optimization by simulated annealing.

Authors:  S Kirkpatrick; C D Gelatt; M P Vecchi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-05-13       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Potential energy functions.

Authors:  T A Halgren
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 5.  Mean-field minimization methods for biological macromolecules.

Authors:  P Koehl; M Delarue
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 6.  An analysis of current methodologies for conformational searching of complex molecules.

Authors:  A E Howard; P A Kollman
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  The crystal structures of [Met5]enkephalin and a third form of [Leu5]enkephalin: observations of a novel pleated beta-sheet.

Authors:  J F Griffin; D A Langs; G D Smith; T L Blundell; I J Tickle; S Bedarkar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Monte Carlo-minimization approach to the multiple-minima problem in protein folding.

Authors:  Z Li; H A Scheraga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Minimization of polypeptide energy. X. A global search algorithm.

Authors:  G M Crippen; H A Scheraga
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 4.013

10.  Enkephalin: conformational analysis by means of empirical energy calculations.

Authors:  Y Isogai; G Némethy; H A Scheraga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Molecular docking studies of protein-nucleotide complexes using MOLSDOCK (mutually orthogonal Latin squares DOCK).

Authors:  Shankaran Nehru Viji; Nagarajan Balaji; Namasivayam Gautham
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 2.  Exploring conformational space using a mean field technique with MOLS sampling.

Authors:  P Arun Prasad; V Kanagasabai; J Arunachalam; N Gautham
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  A new peptide docking strategy using a mean field technique with mutually orthogonal Latin square sampling.

Authors:  P Arun Prasad; N Gautham
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 4.  MOLS sampling and its applications in structural biophysics.

Authors:  L Ramya; Shankaran Nehru Viji; Pandurangan Arun Prasad; Vadivel Kanagasabai; Namasivayam Gautham
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2010-11-16

5.  Protein-small molecule docking with receptor flexibility in iMOLSDOCK.

Authors:  D Sam Paul; N Gautham
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  MOLS 2.0: software package for peptide modeling and protein-ligand docking.

Authors:  D Sam Paul; N Gautham
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  An estimate of the numbers and density of low-energy structures (or decoys) in the conformational landscape of proteins.

Authors:  Kanagasabai Vadivel; Gautham Namasivayam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.