Literature DB >> 18465087

A new peptide docking strategy using a mean field technique with mutually orthogonal Latin square sampling.

P Arun Prasad1, N Gautham.   

Abstract

The theoretical prediction of the association of a flexible ligand with a protein receptor requires efficient sampling of the conformational space of the ligand. Several docking methodologies are currently available. We propose a new docking technique that performs well at low computational cost. The method uses mutually orthogonal Latin squares to efficiently sample the docking space. A variant of the mean field technique is used to analyze this sample to arrive at the optimum. The method has been previously applied to explore the conformational space of peptides and identify structures with low values for the potential energy. Here we extend this method to simultaneously identify both the low energy conformation as well as a 'high-scoring' docking mode. Application of the method to 56 protein-peptide complexes, in which the length of the peptide ligand ranges from three to seven residues, and comparisons with Autodock 3.05, showed that the method works well.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18465087     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-008-9216-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  25 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Molecular recognition and docking algorithms.

Authors:  Natasja Brooijmans; Irwin D Kuntz
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2003-01-28

Review 3.  A review of protein-small molecule docking methods.

Authors:  R D Taylor; P J Jewsbury; J W Essex
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Conformational studies on enkephalins using the MOLS technique.

Authors:  K Vengadesan; N Gautham
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 2.505

5.  Comparative study of several algorithms for flexible ligand docking.

Authors:  Badry D Bursulaya; Maxim Totrov; Ruben Abagyan; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 6.  Computational methods for biomolecular docking.

Authors:  T Lengauer; M Rarey
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 6.809

7.  The role of water in sequence-independent ligand binding by an oligopeptide transporter protein.

Authors:  J R Tame; S H Sleigh; A J Wilkinson; J E Ladbury
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1996-12

8.  Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking.

Authors:  G Jones; P Willett; R C Glen; A R Leach; R Taylor
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-04-04       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  MONTY: a Monte Carlo approach to protein-DNA recognition.

Authors:  R M Knegtel; J Antoon; C Rullmann; R Boelens; R Kaptein
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1994-01-07       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins.

Authors:  I K McDonald; J M Thornton
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1994-05-20       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  11 in total

1.  Molecular docking studies of protein-nucleotide complexes using MOLSDOCK (mutually orthogonal Latin squares DOCK).

Authors:  Shankaran Nehru Viji; Nagarajan Balaji; Namasivayam Gautham
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 2.  MOLS sampling and its applications in structural biophysics.

Authors:  L Ramya; Shankaran Nehru Viji; Pandurangan Arun Prasad; Vadivel Kanagasabai; Namasivayam Gautham
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2010-11-16

3.  Protein-small molecule docking with receptor flexibility in iMOLSDOCK.

Authors:  D Sam Paul; N Gautham
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  MOLS 2.0: software package for peptide modeling and protein-ligand docking.

Authors:  D Sam Paul; N Gautham
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  In silico and in vitro elucidation of BH3 binding specificity toward Bcl-2.

Authors:  Nir London; Stefano Gullá; Amy E Keating; Ora Schueler-Furman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  PEP-SiteFinder: a tool for the blind identification of peptide binding sites on protein surfaces.

Authors:  Adrien Saladin; Julien Rey; Pierre Thévenet; Martin Zacharias; Gautier Moroy; Pierre Tufféry
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Rosetta FlexPepDock ab-initio: simultaneous folding, docking and refinement of peptides onto their receptors.

Authors:  Barak Raveh; Nir London; Lior Zimmerman; Ora Schueler-Furman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Improving Docking Power for Short Peptides Using Random Forest.

Authors:  Michel F Sanner; Leonard Dieguez; Stefano Forli; Ewa Lis
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 6.162

9.  PaFlexPepDock: parallel ab-initio docking of peptides onto their receptors with full flexibility based on Rosetta.

Authors:  Haiou Li; Liyao Lu; Rong Chen; Lijun Quan; Xiaoyan Xia; Qiang Lü
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Ionic channels as targets for drug design: a review on computational methods.

Authors:  Gregorio Fernández-Ballester; Asia Fernández-Carvajal; José Manuel González-Ros; Antonio Ferrer-Montiel
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 6.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.