Literature DB >> 12719189

Effects of Object Texture on Precontact Movement Time in Human Prehension.

T. G. Fikes1, R. L. Klatzky, S. J. Lederman.   

Abstract

Using kinematic data in a precision-grip reaching task, Weir, MacKenzie, Marteniuk, and Cargoe (1991) concluded that prior to contact with an object, its texture does not affect the course of grasping. The present study used their task of reaching for and lifting a slippery-, normal- (polished metal), or rough-surfaced dowel. This occurred under the original, blocked condition, in which textures were held constant within a series of trials, and under a new, randomized condition, in which textures varied randomly from trial to trial. Performance was also examined over more extended periods of practice. Reaction time and precontact movement time were directly measured. In contrast to the results of Weir et al., 1991, reaching for the slippery dowel resulted in slower movement time. This effect was found both early and late in practice for the randomized condition; it was found only in late practice for the blocked condition. These effects can be attributed to the greater geometric and dynamic precision required for lifting a slippery object.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 12719189     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1994.9941688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  14 in total

1.  Compensatory motor control after stroke: an alternative joint strategy for object-dependent shaping of hand posture.

Authors:  Preeti Raghavan; Marco Santello; Andrew M Gordon; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The specificity of learned associations in visuomotor and perceptual processing.

Authors:  L Desanghere; J J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Integrated control of hand transport and orientation during prehension movements.

Authors:  M Desmurget; C Prablanc; M Arzi; Y Rossetti; Y Paulignan; C Urquizar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  To eat or not to eat? Kinematics and muscle activity of reach-to-grasp movements are influenced by the action goal, but observers do not detect these differences.

Authors:  Katherine R Naish; Arran T Reader; Carmel Houston-Price; Andrew J Bremner; Nicholas P Holmes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Center or side: biases in selecting grasp points on small bars.

Authors:  Vivian C Paulun; Urs Kleinholdermann; Karl R Gegenfurtner; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The extent of altered digit force direction correlates with clinical upper extremity impairment in chronic stroke survivors.

Authors:  Na Jin Seo; Leah R Enders; Binal Motawar; Marcella L Kosmopoulos; Mojtaba Fathi-Firoozabad
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Does planning a different trajectory influence the choice of grasping points?

Authors:  Dimitris Voudouris; Eli Brenner; Willemijn D Schot; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Grasping kinematics from the perspective of the individual digits: a modelling study.

Authors:  Rebekka Verheij; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Predicting the effect of surface texture on the qualitative form of prehension.

Authors:  Ian John Flatters; Loanne Otten; Anna Witvliet; Brian Henson; Raymond John Holt; Pete Culmer; Geoffrey Parker Bingham; Richard McGilchrist Wilkie; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Quantifying kinematics of purposeful movements to real, imagined, or absent functional objects: implications for modelling trajectories for robot-assisted ADL tasks.

Authors:  Kimberly J Wisneski; Michelle J Johnson
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.