Literature DB >> 22371590

Adaptive coding of reward prediction errors is gated by striatal coupling.

Soyoung Q Park1, Thorsten Kahnt, Deborah Talmi, Jörg Rieskamp, Raymond J Dolan, Hauke R Heekeren.   

Abstract

To efficiently represent all of the possible rewards in the world, dopaminergic midbrain neurons dynamically adapt their coding range to the momentarily available rewards. Specifically, these neurons increase their activity for an outcome that is better than expected and decrease it for an outcome worse than expected, independent of the absolute reward magnitude. Although this adaptive coding is well documented, it remains unknown how this rescaling is implemented. To investigate the adaptive coding of prediction errors and its underlying rescaling process, we used human functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in combination with a reward prediction task that involved different reward magnitudes. We demonstrate that reward prediction errors in the human striatum are expressed according to an adaptive coding scheme. Strikingly, we show that adaptive coding is gated by changes in effective connectivity between the striatum and other reward-sensitive regions, namely the midbrain and the medial prefrontal cortex. Our results provide evidence that striatal prediction errors are normalized by a magnitude-dependent alteration in the interregional connectivity within the brain's reward system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22371590      PMCID: PMC3306682          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1119969109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  43 in total

1.  Dorsal striatal-midbrain connectivity in humans predicts how reinforcements are used to guide decisions.

Authors:  Thorsten Kahnt; Soyoung Q Park; Michael X Cohen; Anne Beck; Andreas Heinz; Jana Wrase
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging.

Authors:  Suzanne N Haber; Brian Knutson
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Characterizing stimulus-response functions using nonlinear regressors in parametric fMRI experiments.

Authors:  C Büchel; A P Holmes; G Rees; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Intrinsic functional connectivity as a tool for human connectomics: theory, properties, and optimization.

Authors:  Koene R A Van Dijk; Trey Hedden; Archana Venkataraman; Karleyton C Evans; Sara W Lazar; Randy L Buckner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Prefrontal cortex fails to learn from reward prediction errors in alcohol dependence.

Authors:  Soyoung Q Park; Thorsten Kahnt; Anne Beck; Michael X Cohen; Raymond J Dolan; Jana Wrase; Andreas Heinz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Dopamine reward circuitry: two projection systems from the ventral midbrain to the nucleus accumbens-olfactory tubercle complex.

Authors:  Satoshi Ikemoto
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2007-05-17

8.  Prefrontal cortical projections to the midbrain in primates: evidence for a sparse connection.

Authors:  William Gordon Frankle; Mark Laruelle; Suzanne N Haber
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 7.853

9.  Medial orbitofrontal cortex codes relative rather than absolute value of financial rewards in humans.

Authors:  R Elliott; Z Agnew; J F W Deakin
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Adaptation of reward sensitivity in orbitofrontal neurons.

Authors:  Shunsuke Kobayashi; Ofelia Pinto de Carvalho; Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  24 in total

1.  An Obesity-Predisposing Variant of the FTO Gene Regulates D2R-Dependent Reward Learning.

Authors:  Meltem Sevgi; Lionel Rigoux; Anne B Kühn; Jan Mauer; Leonhard Schilbach; Martin E Hess; Theo O J Gruendler; Markus Ullsperger; Klaas Enno Stephan; Jens C Brüning; Marc Tittgemeyer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  How glitter relates to gold: similarity-dependent reward prediction errors in the human striatum.

Authors:  Thorsten Kahnt; Soyoung Q Park; Christopher J Burke; Philippe N Tobler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex Encodes the Integrated Incentive Motivational Value of Cognitive Task Performance.

Authors:  Debbie M Yee; Jennifer L Crawford; Bidhan Lamichhane; Todd S Braver
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  A Bayesian model of context-sensitive value attribution.

Authors:  Francesco Rigoli; Karl J Friston; Cristina Martinelli; Mirjana Selaković; Sukhwinder S Shergill; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 5.  Value normalization in decision making: theory and evidence.

Authors:  Antonio Rangel; John A Clithero
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  How the Level of Reward Awareness Changes the Computational and Electrophysiological Signatures of Reinforcement Learning.

Authors:  Camile M C Correa; Samuel Noorman; Jun Jiang; Stefano Palminteri; Michael X Cohen; Maël Lebreton; Simon van Gaal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Structural covariance networks of striatum subdivision in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Kun-Hsien Chou; Wei-Che Lin; Pei-Lin Lee; Nai-Wen Tsai; Yung-Cheng Huang; Hsiu-Ling Chen; Kuei-Yueh Cheng; Pei-Chin Chen; Hung-Chen Wang; Tsu-Kung Lin; Shau-Hsuan Li; Wei-Ming Lin; Cheng-Hsien Lu; Ching-Po Lin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  BOLD subjective value signals exhibit robust range adaptation.

Authors:  Karin M Cox; Joseph W Kable
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Partial Adaptation of Obtained and Observed Value Signals Preserves Information about Gains and Losses.

Authors:  Christopher J Burke; Michelle Baddeley; Philippe N Tobler; Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Damage Is Associated with Decreased Ventral Striatum Volume and Response to Reward.

Authors:  Maia S Pujara; Carissa L Philippi; Julian C Motzkin; Mustafa K Baskaya; Michael Koenigs
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.