Literature DB >> 12716037

Socioeconomic factors and breast cancer in black and white Americans.

Nahida H Gordon1.   

Abstract

The incidence of breast cancer in the US is known to be higher among white than black women and among women of higher socioeconomic status (SES), but once a woman, either black or white, has the disease, she is more likely to have a recurrence and to die of breast cancer if she is of lower socioeconomic status. Explanations for these observed differences are varied and inconsistent making it clear that these reported differentials are not sufficiently understood. In understanding breast cancer in a multicultural setting, delay in diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment are frequently the focus of attention. However these factors do not sufficiently explain the observed differences between blacks and whites. A review of recent literature reveals an increasing focus on the role of SES in breast cancer etiology, and progression; however, the confounding of SES with race/ethnicity (black vs. white) contributes to the insufficient understanding of the effect of these two factors. This report will focus on the interplay between race/ethnicity and SES and their relative effects upon analyses of survival from breast cancer. Findings are based on prospective clinical trial data. SES factors have been associated with most of the known or suspected risk factors for breast cancer incidence and progression. In addition to race/ethnicity, SES is also associated with diet, lifestyle factors, physical characteristics, and tumor characteristics. Without controlling for other risk factors, the ratios of risk for blacks with respect to whites for disease-free survival and overall survival were 1.30 (95% CI: 1.04-1.61) and 1.42 (95% CI: 1.15-1.76), respectively. However, after controlling for patient risk factors, such as the number of positive lymph nodes, tumor diameter, estrogen receptor status and socioeconomic factors, these differences decrease and are not statistically significant. Socioeconomic status is associated both with race/ethnicity and estrogen receptor status. A loglinear analysis demonstrates that the apparent association of race/ethnicity with estrogen receptor status is mediated by socioeconomic status. An implication of this finding is that environmental and lifestyle components rather than genetic factors associated with race may explain the observed differentials between black and white breast cancer patients. Knowledge of environmental factors associated with SES have the potential for providing important clues about the prevention and control of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12716037     DOI: 10.1023/a:1022212018158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev        ISSN: 0167-7659            Impact factor:   9.264


  25 in total

1.  African ancestry and higher prevalence of triple-negative breast cancer: findings from an international study.

Authors:  Azadeh Stark; Celina G Kleer; Iman Martin; Baffour Awuah; Anthony Nsiah-Asare; Valerie Takyi; Maria Braman; Solomon E Quayson; Richard Zarbo; Max Wicha; Lisa Newman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  An Evaluation of Psychosocial and Religious Belief Differences in a Diverse Racial and Socioeconomic Urban Cancer Population.

Authors:  Blase N Polite; Toni Cipriano-Steffens; Fay Hlubocky; James Dignam; Mandira Ray; David Smith; Samir Undevia; Evie Sprague; Olufunmilayo Olopade; Christopher Daugherty; George Fitchett; Sarah Gehlert
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2016-03-16

3.  The Effect of Socio-Economic-Cultural Factors on Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Abdurahman Kuzhan; Mustafa Adlı
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2015-01-01

4.  Lower vitamin-D production from solar ultraviolet-B irradiance may explain some differences in cancer survival rates.

Authors:  William B Grant
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  Time to diagnosis and breast cancer stage by race/ethnicity.

Authors:  Erica T Warner; Rulla M Tamimi; Melissa E Hughes; Rebecca A Ottesen; Yu-Ning Wong; Stephen B Edge; Richard L Theriault; Douglas W Blayney; Joyce C Niland; Eric P Winer; Jane C Weeks; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Reported Biologic Differences in Breast Cancer by Race Due to Disparities in Screening.

Authors:  Ryan A Denu
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 31.777

7.  The influence of race, ethnicity, and individual socioeconomic factors on breast cancer stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  Paula M Lantz; Mahasin Mujahid; Kendra Schwartz; Nancy K Janz; Angela Fagerlin; Barbara Salem; Lihua Liu; Dennis Deapen; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Effects of social injustice on breast health-seeking behaviors of low-income women.

Authors:  Shelly-Ann Bowen; Edith M Williams; Chayah M Stoneberg-Cooper; Saundra H Glover; Michelle S Williams; Michael D Byrd
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr

9.  Race/ethnicity and breast cancer estrogen receptor status: impact of class, missing data, and modeling assumptions.

Authors:  Nancy Krieger; Jarvis T Chen; James H Ware; Afamia Kaddour
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 10.  Using Genetic Technologies To Reduce, Rather Than Widen, Health Disparities.

Authors:  Caren E Smith; Stephanie M Fullerton; Keith A Dookeran; Heather Hampel; Adrienne Tin; Nisa M Maruthur; Jonathan C Schisler; Jeffrey A Henderson; Katherine L Tucker; José M Ordovás
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 6.301

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.