Literature DB >> 12711922

Influence of the number of alcohol and water bottles on murine alcohol intake.

M G Tordoff1, A A Bachmanov.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most work to understand the controls of alcohol intake by animals involves the two-bottle choice method. Recent experiments involving other nutrients suggest that intakes are profoundly influenced by the number of nutrient choices available. Here, we extended these observations by measuring the alcohol consumption of mice and rats given multiple choices of water and alcohol.
METHODS: Four experiments were conducted. In experiments 1 and 2, male C57BL6/J (B6) mice, 129X1/SvJ mice, or Sprague-Dawley rats received a series of six 72- or 48-hr tests in which the number of bottles of 10% alcohol and water was manipulated. One test involved the typical two-bottle choice. In the other five, the rodents always had six bottles with one, two, three, four, or five containing 10% alcohol and the rest containing water. In experiment 3, separate groups of B6 mice received for 16 days (a) the typical two-bottle test, (b) five alcohol bottles and one water bottle, (c) three alcohol bottles and three water bottles, or (d) one alcohol bottle and five water bottles. In experiment 4, groups of B6 mice received either a two-bottle test or five alcohol bottles and one water bottle for 24 days.
RESULTS: In all experiments, the volume of alcohol consumed was strongly and positively related to the number of alcohol bottles available and inversely related to the number of water bottles available. The effect of alcohol availability on alcohol intake persisted for at least 24 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol intake is strongly influenced by availability. The results point to a simple method of manipulating murine alcohol intake over a wide range. They provide an animal model that might be useful for understanding the influence of alcohol availability on human alcohol consumption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12711922      PMCID: PMC2435231          DOI: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000060529.30157.38

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  17 in total

1.  Influence of test duration on the sensitivity of the two-bottle choice test.

Authors:  Michael G Tordoff; Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  The maintenance diets of C57BL/6J and 129X1/SvJ mice influence their taste solution preferences: implications for large-scale phenotyping projects.

Authors:  Michael G Tordoff; Diane M Pilchak; Julie A Williams; Amanda H McDaniel; Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  MEASUREMENT OF ALCOHOL PREFERENCE IN GENETIC EXPERIMENTS.

Authors:  J L FULLER
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1964-02

4.  Nutrition and the etiology of alcoholism; the effect of sucrose, saccharin and fat on the self-selection of ethyl alcohol by rats.

Authors:  D LESTER; L A GREENBERG
Journal:  Q J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1952-12

Review 5.  Satiety: an ecological perspective.

Authors:  G H Collier
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Effects of concurrent access to multiple ethanol concentrations and repeated deprivations on alcohol intake of alcohol-preferring rats.

Authors:  Z A Rodd-Henricks; R L Bell; K A Kuc; J M Murphy; W J McBride; L Lumeng; T K Li
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  Intake of ethanol, sodium chloride, sucrose, citric acid, and quinine hydrochloride solutions by mice: a genetic analysis.

Authors:  A A Bachmanov; D R Reed; M G Tordoff; R A Price; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  Mouse taste preference tests: why only two bottles?

Authors:  Michael G Tordoff; Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Ethanol-maintained behavior in a foraging context: effects of search and procurement cost.

Authors:  A Liguori
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Ethanol consumption and taste preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129/J mice.

Authors:  A A Bachmanov; M G Tordoff; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.455

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Preclinical studies of alcohol binge drinking.

Authors:  John C Crabbe; R Adron Harris; George F Koob
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 2.  "Drinking in the dark" (DID) procedures: a model of binge-like ethanol drinking in non-dependent mice.

Authors:  Todd E Thiele; Montserrat Navarro
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.405

3.  Sweetened ethanol drinking during social isolation: enhanced intake, resistance to genetic heterogeneity and the emergence of a distinctive drinking pattern in adolescent mice.

Authors:  J B Panksepp; E D Rodriguez; A E Ryabinin
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.449

4.  Taste dysfunction in BTBR mice due to a mutation of Itpr3, the inositol triphosphate receptor 3 gene.

Authors:  Michael G Tordoff; Hillary T Ellis
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 5.  In vitro and in vivo models of acute alcohol exposure.

Authors:  Angela Dolganiuc; Gyongyi Szabo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Forty mouse strain survey of voluntary calcium intake, blood calcium, and bone mineral content.

Authors:  Michael G Tordoff; Alexander A Bachmanov; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-04-01

7.  Forty mouse strain survey of water and sodium intake.

Authors:  Michael G Tordoff; Alexander A Bachmanov; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-04-01

8.  Mouse taste preference tests: why only two bottles?

Authors:  Michael G Tordoff; Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Calcium taste preferences: genetic analysis and genome screen of C57BL/6J x PWK/PhJ hybrid mice.

Authors:  M G Tordoff; D R Reed; H Shao
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 3.449

10.  Taste solution preferences of C57BL/6J and 129X1/SvJ mice: influence of age, sex, and diet.

Authors:  Michael G Tordoff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 3.160

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.