Literature DB >> 12708102

Back extensor muscle endurance test scores in coal miners in Australia.

Mark Stewart1, Jane Latimer, Michael Jamieson.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A cross-sectional analytic study was conducted.
OBJECTIVES: To collect normative data on back extensor endurance holding times and evaluate the discriminative validity of the Biering-Sorensen test in a group of coal miners in Australia. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Low back pain is a common complaint among those working in the Australian coal mining industry. One test that may be predictive of first-time episodes of low back pain is the Biering-Sorensen test of back extensor endurance strength. While this test has been evaluated in overseas sedentary populations, normative data and the discriminative ability of the test have not been evaluated with coal miners.
METHODS: Eighty-eight coal miners completed a questionnaire for known risk factors for low back pain, performed the Biering-Sorensen test, and undertook a test of aerobic fitness. Data analysis was performed to describe the groups and to determine whether any significant difference existed between those with a past history of low back pain and those without.
RESULTS: Significantly lower than expected holding times were found in this group of coal miners (mean 113 s). This result was significantly lower than demonstrated in previous studies (mean 138 s, t87 = 6.32, p < 0.001). When holding times for those with a past history of low back pain were compared with times for those with no history of low back pain, the difference was not statistically significant (t86 = 1.56, p = 0.12), nor was there a significant difference in fitness between those with a past history of low back pain and those without (t86 = 0.47, p = 0.64). DISCUSSION/
CONCLUSIONS: Coal miners in Australia have lower than normal Biering-Sorensen holding times. This lower back holding time does not differ between coal miners with a past history of low back pain and those without.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12708102     DOI: 10.1023/a:1022547714552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  22 in total

1.  Static back endurance and the risk of low-back pain.

Authors:  H Alaranta; S Luoto; M Heliövaara; H Hurri
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Endurance times for low back stabilization exercises: clinical targets for testing and training from a normal database.

Authors:  S M McGill; A Childs; C Liebenson
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Psychologic distress and low back pain. Evidence from a prospective study in the general population.

Authors:  P R Croft; A C Papageorgiou; S Ferry; E Thomas; M I Jayson; A J Silman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Psychosocial factors in the workplace--do they predict new episodes of low back pain? Evidence from the South Manchester Back Pain Study.

Authors:  A C Papageorgiou; G J Macfarlane; E Thomas; P R Croft; M I Jayson; A J Silman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Physical measurements as risk indicators for low-back trouble over a one-year period.

Authors:  F Biering-Sørensen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of physical performance tests in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  M J Simmonds; S L Olson; S Jones; T Hussein; C E Lee; D Novy; H Radwan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Trunk muscle strength and back muscle endurance in construction workers with and without low back disorders.

Authors:  E Holmström; U Moritz; M Andersson
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1992

8.  Normal trunk muscle strength and endurance in women and the effect of exercises and electrical stimulation. Part 1: Normal endurance and trunk muscle strength in 101 women.

Authors:  M Nordin; N Kahanovitz; R Verderame; M Parnianpour; S Yabut; K Viola; N Greenidge; M Mulvihill
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Trunk strength, back muscle endurance and low-back trouble.

Authors:  T Nicolaisen; K Jørgensen
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1985

10.  Electromyographic evaluation of back muscle fatigue with repeated sustained contractions of different strengths.

Authors:  H Seidel; H Beyer; D Bräuer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1987
View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of different trunk endurance testing methods in college-aged individuals.

Authors:  Michael P Reiman; Amber D Krier; Julie A Nelson; Michael A Rogers; Zachariah O Stuke; Barbara S Smith
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-10

2.  A comparison of pain level and entropy changes following core stability exercise intervention.

Authors:  Taero Lee; Yoon Hyuk Kim; Paul S Sung
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-07

3.  Prevalence of low back pain and associated occupational factors among Chinese coal miners.

Authors:  Guangxing Xu; Dong Pang; Fengying Liu; Desheng Pei; Sheng Wang; Liping Li
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Musculoskeletal Disorders in Tyre Manufacturing Workers.

Authors:  Neha Mukkamala; Lata Parmar; Palani Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2021-10-09

5.  Physical capacity of rescue personnel in the mining industry.

Authors:  Ian B Stewart; Michael D McDonald; Andrew P Hunt; Tony W Parker
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2008-10-12       Impact factor: 2.646

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.