Literature DB >> 12704632

Communication about carrier testing within hemophilia A families.

James R Sorenson1, Tracey Jennings-Grant, Jamie Newman.   

Abstract

Genetic diseases are family diseases. Although there is considerable research on how individuals decide to have genetic testing and their individual reactions to testing, there is limited research on the familial context of genetic testing. In the present study, we focus on three aspects of the family context of genetic testing for hemophilia A carrier status among women at risk to be carriers. We look at the extent to which there was discussion of carrier testing for hemophilia before we offered DNA-based carrier testing to these at-risk women; with which family members these tested women communicated the results of their carrier testing; and concerns these women had about communicating their carrier test results with relatives, including their children. Data suggest that members of families with hemophilia discussed carrier testing prior to study participation, that the communication of testing information within families was selective, not universal, largely following gender lines for this X-linked disorder, and that there was limited concern about communicating carrier status information to children and other relatives. These data reinforce observations that families are social systems, and within these systems information is selectively communicated. A more complete understanding of how families communicate genetic test information will enable providers to develop more effective means of assisting individuals in handling the familial communication aspects of genetic testing. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12704632     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.10001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet        ISSN: 1552-4868            Impact factor:   3.908


  14 in total

1.  Parents' perceptions of functioning in families having a child with a genetic condition.

Authors:  Kathleen A Knafl; George J Knafl; Agatha M Gallo; Denise Angst
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Genetic testing in asymptomatic minors: background considerations towards ESHG Recommendations.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Martina C Cornel; Angus Clarke; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: a Survey of Perspectives on Carrier Testing and Communication Within the Family.

Authors:  Brenna Hayes; Susan Hassed; Jae Lindsay Chaloner; Christopher E Aston; Carrie Guy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  The impact of participation in genetic research for families with cleft lip with and without cleft palate: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Lynley J Donoghue; Margaret A Sahhar; Ravi Savarirayan; Supriya Raj; Nicky M Kilpatrick; Laura E Forrest
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-02-06

5.  Uptake of Genetic Counseling, Knowledge of Bleeding risks and Psychosocial Impact in a South African Cohort of Female Relatives of People with Hemophilia.

Authors:  Anne Gillham; Brenda Greyling; Tina-Marie Wessels; Bongi Mbele; Rosemarie Schwyzer; Amanda Krause; Johnny Mahlangu
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Points to Consider: Ethical, Legal, and Psychosocial Implications of Genetic Testing in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; John W Belmont; Jonathan S Berg; Benjamin E Berkman; Yvonne Bombard; Ingrid A Holm; Howard P Levy; Kelly E Ormond; Howard M Saal; Nancy B Spinner; Benjamin S Wilfond; Joseph D McInerney
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Why Do Parents Want to Know their Child's Carrier Status? A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Danya F Vears; Clare Delany; John Massie; Lynn Gillam
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Family-based detection for hereditary hemochromatosis.

Authors:  Michele Reyes; Diane O Dunet; Karen Bandel Isenberg; Michael Trisolini; Diane K Wagener
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  A family genetic risk communication framework: guiding tool development in genetics health services.

Authors:  Miriam E Wiens; Brenda J Wilson; Christina Honeywell; Holly Etchegary
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-01-15

Review 10.  Disclosure of genetic information within families.

Authors:  Agatha M Gallo; Denise B Angst; Kathleen A Knafl
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.220

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.