Literature DB >> 12703641

Economic merit of crossbred and purebred US dairy cattle.

P M VanRaden1, A H Sanders.   

Abstract

Heterosis and breed differences were estimated for milk yield traits, somatic cell score (SCS), and productive life (PL), a measure of longevity. Yield trait data were from 10,442 crossbreds and 140,421 purebreds born since 1990 in 572 herds. Productive life data were from 41,131 crossbred cows and 726,344 purebreds born from 1960 through 1991. The model for test-day yields and SCS included effects of herd-year-season, age, lactation stage, regression on sire's predicted transmitting ability, additive breed effects, heterosis, and recombination. The model for PL included herd-year-season, breed effects, and general heterosis. All effects were assumed to be additive, but estimates of heterosis were converted to a percentage of the parent breed average for reporting. Estimates of general heterosis were 3.4% for milk yield, 4.4% for fat yield, and 4.1% for protein yield. A coefficient of general recombination was derived for multiple-breed crosses, but recombination effects were not well estimated and small gains, not losses, were observed for yield traits in later generations. Heterosis for SCS was not significant. Estimated heterosis for PL was 1.2% of mean productive life and remained constant across the range of birth years. Protein yield of Brown Swiss x Holstein crossbreds (0.94 kg/d) equaled protein yield of purebred Holsteins. Fat yields of Jersey x Holstein and Brown Swiss x Holstein crossbreds (1.14 and 1.13 kg/d, respectively) slightly exceeded that of Holsteins (1.12 kg/d). With cheese yield pricing and with all traits considered, profit from these crosses exceeded that of Holsteins for matings at breed bases. For elite matings, Holsteins were favored because the range of evaluations is smaller and genetic progress is slower in breeds other than Holstein, in part because fewer bulls are sampled. A combined national evaluation of data for all breeds and crossbreds may be desirable but would require an extensive programming effort. Animals should receive credit for heterosis when considered as mates for another breed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12703641     DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73687-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  20 in total

1.  Variance components for susceptibility to Mycobacterium bovis infection in dairy and beef cattle.

Authors:  Ian W Richardson; Dan G Bradley; Isabella M Higgins; Simon J More; Jennifer McClure; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 4.297

2.  Impact of crossbreeding Holstein and Brown Swiss cows on milk yield, composition, and fatty acid profiles in subtropics.

Authors:  Mahmoud S El-Tarabany; Akram A El-Tarabany; Sana S Emara
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Using the difference in actual and expected calf liveweight relative to its dam liveweight as a statistic for interherd and intraherd benchmarking and genetic evaluations1.

Authors:  Noirin McHugh; Ross D Evans; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Feed efficiency and carcass metrics in growing cattle1.

Authors:  David N Kelly; Craig Murphy; Roy D Sleator; Michelle M Judge; Stephen B Conroy; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Animal-level factors associated with the achievement of desirable specifications in Irish beef carcasses graded using the EUROP classification system.

Authors:  David Kenny; Craig P Murphy; Roy D Sleator; Michelle M Judge; Ross D Evans; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Dressing percentage and the differential between live weight and carcass weight in cattle are influenced by both genetic and non-genetic factors1.

Authors:  Jessica M Coyne; Ross D Evans; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Feed and production efficiency of young crossbred beef cattle stratified on a terminal total merit index.

Authors:  David N Kelly; Stephen B Conroy; Craig P Murphy; Roy D Sleator; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2020-07-01

8.  Genetic correlations between endo-parasite phenotypes and economically important traits in dairy and beef cattle.

Authors:  Alan J Twomey; Rebecca I Carroll; Michael L Doherty; Noel Byrne; David A Graham; Riona G Sayers; Astrid Blom; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Risk factors associated with animal mortality in pasture-based, seasonal-calving dairy and beef herds.

Authors:  S C Ring; J McCarthy; M M Kelleher; M L Doherty; D P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Genetic and non-genetic factors associated with health and vitality traits in beef calves.

Authors:  Tom Condon; Craig Murphy; Roy D Sleator; Michelle M Judge; Siobhan Ring; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.