Literature DB >> 30785187

Dressing percentage and the differential between live weight and carcass weight in cattle are influenced by both genetic and non-genetic factors1.

Jessica M Coyne1, Ross D Evans2, Donagh P Berry1.   

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to quantify the genetic and non-genetic contributors to variability in both carcass dressing percentage and dressing difference (i.e., the difference between carcass weight and live weight immediately prior to slaughter) in young animals and cows. The datasets contained 18,479 young animals from 653 herds, and 2,887 cows from 665 herds. Live weight records within 7 d of slaughter and associated carcass weight were available for all animals. Association analyses were undertaken using linear mixed models with fixed effects for the model of young animals consisting of animal breed, days between the date of last recorded live weight and slaughter date, heterosis and recombination loss coefficients, dam parity, a 3-way interaction between whether the animal originated in a dairy or beef herd, animal sex, and age at slaughter, as well as a 2-way interaction between calendar year of slaughter and month of slaughter; contemporary group was included as a random effect. Fixed effects in the cow model were cow breed, the number of days between the date of last recorded live weight and slaughter date, heterosis and recombination loss coefficients, the number of days postcalving, parity of the cow, and a 2-way interaction between calendar year of slaughter and month of slaughter; contemporary group was included as a random effect. The mean dressing percentage (phenotypic standard deviation in parentheses) and dressing difference in young animals were 55.86% (3.21%) and 280.03 kg (41.44 kg), respectively. Steers had the heaviest dressing difference at 34.18 and 60.44 kg heavier than a 16-mo old bull and 22-mo old heifer, respectively. Dressing difference for 30-mo old Simmental steers (breed with heaviest dressing difference) was 41.66 kg heavier than 30-mo old Belgian Blue steers (breed with lightest dressing difference). The heritability of dressing percentage (0.48) and dressing difference (0.35) in young animals was relatively similar to each other, in contrast to dressing percentage (0.08) in cows which was considerably lower than dressing difference (0.28). Considerable genetic variability existed in dressing difference amongst young animals (genetic standard deviation of 15.03 kg), despite the near unity genetic correlation (0.93) between carcass weight and live weight. This therefore indicates that genetic selection for increased saleable product can be achieved by selecting for increased carcass weight while concurrently selecting for lighter animals although the opportunity is limited by the strong part-whole relationships that exists between carcass weight, live weight, and dressing difference.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cattle; dressing difference; dressing percentage

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30785187      PMCID: PMC6447276          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  21 in total

1.  Parameter estimates for genetic effects on carcass traits of Korean native cattle.

Authors:  J W Lee; S B Choi; J S Kim; J F Keown; L D Van Vleck
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Genetic variation in wholesale carcass cuts predicted from digital images in cattle.

Authors:  T Pabiou; W F Fikse; P R Amer; A R Cromie; A Näsholm; D P Berry
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Effect of grass silage and concentrate based finishing strategies on cull dairy cow performance, carcass and meat quality characteristics.

Authors:  W Minchin; F Buckley; D A Kenny; F J Monahan; L Shalloo; M O'Donovan
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Genetic analysis of carcass traits of steers adjusted to age, weight, or fat thickness slaughter endpoints.

Authors:  A Ríos-Utrera; L V Cundiff; K E Gregory; R M Koch; M E Dikeman; M Koohmaraie; L D Van Vleck
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Estimation of genetic gain in milk yield by selection in a closed herd of dairy cattle.

Authors:  J M RENDEL; A ROBERTSON
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  1950-06       Impact factor: 1.166

6.  Estimated genetic parameters for carcass traits of Brahman cattle.

Authors:  D G Riley; C C Chase; A C Hammond; R L West; D D Johnson; T A Olson; S W Coleman
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Economic merit of crossbred and purebred US dairy cattle.

Authors:  P M VanRaden; A H Sanders
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Genetic relationships among body condition score, body weight, milk yield, and fertility in dairy cows.

Authors:  D P Berry; F Buckley; P Dillon; R D Evans; M Rath; R F Veerkamp
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Genetics of reproductive performance in seasonal calving beef cows and its association with performance traits.

Authors:  D P Berry; R D Evans
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Genetic parameters for level and change of body condition score and body weight in dairy cows.

Authors:  D P Berry; F Buckley; P Dillon; R D Evans; M Rath; R F Veerkamp
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.034

View more
  11 in total

1.  Feed efficiency and carcass metrics in growing cattle1.

Authors:  David N Kelly; Craig Murphy; Roy D Sleator; Michelle M Judge; Stephen B Conroy; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Phenotypic and genetic associations between feeding behavior and carcass merit in crossbred growing cattle.

Authors:  David N Kelly; Roy D Sleator; Craig P Murphy; Stephen B Conroy; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Feed and production efficiency of young crossbred beef cattle stratified on a terminal total merit index.

Authors:  David N Kelly; Stephen B Conroy; Craig P Murphy; Roy D Sleator; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2020-07-01

4.  An index framework founded on the future profit potential of female beef cattle to aid the identification of candidates for culling.

Authors:  Fíona L Dunne; Donagh P Berry; Margaret M Kelleher; Ross D Evans; Siobhan W Walsh; Peter R Amer
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Carcass and efficiency metrics of beef cattle differ by whether the calf was born in a dairy or a beef herd.

Authors:  Alan J Twomey; Siobhán C Ring; Noirin McHugh; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Genomic Prediction and Association Analysis with Models Including Dominance Effects for Important Traits in Chinese Simmental Beef Cattle.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Lei Xu; Zezhao Wang; Ling Xu; Yan Chen; Lupei Zhang; Lingyang Xu; Xue Gao; Huijiang Gao; Bo Zhu; Junya Li
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Tropical Livestock Units: Re-evaluating a Methodology.

Authors:  Peregrine Rothman-Ostrow; William Gilbert; Jonathan Rushton
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-11-20

8.  Effects of feeding starch sugar by-products on in situ rumen disappearance rate, growth performance, and carcass characteristics of late finishing Hanwoo steers.

Authors:  Yongjun Choi; Geetae Park; Hyokon Kang; Jiyeon Ahn; Eunchae Lee; Youngjun Na; Sangrak Lee
Journal:  Anim Biosci       Date:  2021-08-21

9.  Commercial beef farms excelling in terminal and maternal genetic merit generate more gross profit.

Authors:  David N Kelly; K Connolly; P Kelly; A R Cromie; C P Murphy; R D Sleator; D P Berry
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-06-09

Review 10.  Beef production from cull dairy cows: a review from culling to consumption.

Authors:  Ligia C Moreira; Guilherme J M Rosa; Daniel M Schaefer
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.338

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.