Literature DB >> 12699316

Letter visibility and the viewing position effect in visual word recognition.

Michaël Stevens1, Jonathan Grainger.   

Abstract

The ease with which printed words are recognized depends on the position at which the eyes initially fixate the word. In this study, we examined to what extent recognition performance for each fixation position depends on the average visibility of the word's constituent letters. Experiment 1 measured recognition performance to single letters embedded in strings of Xs (lengths of 5 and 7) for all combinations of letter position and initial fixation position in the string. In Experiment 2, recognition performance was measured for five-letter and seven-letter words as a function of initial fixation position in the word. Whereas average letter visibility showed a symmetric function in Experiment 1, the word recognition data of Experiment 2 showed the typical asymmetric curve. Combining the letter visibility data with measures of lexical constraint using absolute letter-in-string positions failed to capture the pattern in the word data. An alternative measure of constraint based on relative position coding of letters generated more accurate predictions.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12699316     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  18 in total

1.  Reevaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: hemispheric dominance, retinal location, and the word-nonword effect.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Kevin B Paterson; Stoyan Kurtev
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Friends in Low-Entropy Places: Orthographic Neighbor Effects on Visual Word Identification Differ Across Letter Positions.

Authors:  Sahil Luthra; Heejo You; Jay G Rueckl; James S Magnuson
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-12

3.  The first letter position effect in visual word recognition: The role of spatial attention.

Authors:  Andrew J Aschenbrenner; David A Balota; Alexandra J Weigand; Michele Scaltritti; Derek Besner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Reading with a filtered fovea: the influence of visual quality at the point of fixation during reading.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Victoria A McGowan; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

5.  Are all letters really processed equally and in parallel? Further evidence of a robust first letter advantage.

Authors:  Michele Scaltritti; David A Balota
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2013-09-04

6.  Viewing-position effects in the Stroop task: Initial fixation position modulates Stroop effects in fully colored words.

Authors:  Patrick Perret; Stéphanie Ducrot
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-08

7.  Dependence of reading speed on letter spacing in central vision loss.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Spatial-frequency and contrast properties of reading in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Watching the Word Go by: On the Time-course of Component Processes in Visual Word Recognition.

Authors:  Jonathan Grainger; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2009-01-01

10.  Relationship between slow visual processing and reading speed in people with macular degeneration.

Authors:  Allen M Y Cheong; Gordon E Legge; Mary G Lawrence; Sing-Hang Cheung; Mary A Ruff
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.