Literature DB >> 28182479

The first letter position effect in visual word recognition: The role of spatial attention.

Andrew J Aschenbrenner1, David A Balota1, Alexandra J Weigand1, Michele Scaltritti2, Derek Besner3.   

Abstract

A prominent question in visual word recognition is whether letters within a word are processed in parallel or in a left to right sequence. Although most contemporary models posit parallel processing, this notion seems at odds with well-established serial position effects in word identification that indicate preferential processing for the initial letter. The present study reports 4 experiments designed to further probe the locus of the first position processing advantage. The paradigm involved masked target words presented for short durations and required participants to subsequently select from 2 alternatives, 1 which was identical to the target and 1 that differed by a single letter. Experiment 1 manipulated the case between the target and the alternatives to ensure that previous evidence for a first position effect was not due to simple perceptual matching. The results continued to yield a robust first position advantage. Experiment 2 attempted to eliminate postperceptual decision processes as the explanatory mechanism by presenting single letters as targets and requiring participants to select an entire word that contained the target letter at different positions. Here the first position advantage was eliminated, suggesting postperceptual decision processes do not underlie the effect. The final 2 experiments presented masked stimuli either all vertically (Experiment 3) or randomly intermixed vertical and horizontal orientation (Experiment 4). In both cases, a robust first position advantage was still obtained. The authors consider alternative interpretations of this effect and suggest that these results are consistent with a rapid deployment of spatial attention to the beginning of a target string which occurs poststimulus onset. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28182479      PMCID: PMC5367936          DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  40 in total

1.  Does priming specific syllables during tip-of-the-tongue states facilitate word retrieval in older adults?

Authors:  Katherine K White; Lise Abrams
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2002-06

2.  The role of spatial attention in visual word processing.

Authors:  R S McCann; C L Folk; J C Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Spatial attention modulates feature crosstalk in visual word processing.

Authors:  Evan F Risko; Jennifer A Stolz; Derek Besner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): still no identification without attention.

Authors:  Joel Lachter; Kenneth I Forster; Eric Ruthruff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Letters in time and retinotopic space.

Authors:  James S Adelman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Detecting targets in letter and non-letter arrays.

Authors:  E J Hammond; D W Green
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1982-03

7.  Integrating information across eye movements.

Authors:  K Rayner; G W McConkie; D Zola
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  A developmental investigation of the first-letter advantage.

Authors:  Jonathan Grainger; Daisy Bertrand; Bernard Lété; Elisabeth Beyersmann; Johannes C Ziegler
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2016-08-20

9.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.

Authors:  M S Seidenberg; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Automaticity revisited: when print doesn't activate semantics.

Authors:  Elsa M Labuschagne; Derek Besner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-10
View more
  8 in total

1.  Deepening understanding of language through synaesthesia: a call to reform and expand.

Authors:  Jennifer L Mankin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Some further clarifications on age-related differences in the Stroop task: New evidence from the two-to-one Stroop paradigm.

Authors:  Mariana Burca; Pierre Chausse; Ludovic Ferrand; Benjamin A Parris; Maria Augustinova
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-09-30

3.  Letter and word identification in the fovea and parafovea.

Authors:  Michele Scaltritti; Jonathan Grainger; Stéphane Dufau
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Stimulus orientation and the first-letter advantage.

Authors:  Michele Scaltritti; Stéphane Dufau; Jonathan Grainger
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2018-01-03

5.  Visual attention span performance in German-speaking children with differential reading and spelling profiles: No evidence of group differences.

Authors:  Chiara Banfi; Ferenc Kemény; Melanie Gangl; Gerd Schulte-Körne; Kristina Moll; Karin Landerl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effects of adult aging on letter position coding in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Kayleigh L Warrington; Victoria A McGowan; Kevin B Paterson; Sarah J White
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2019-03-28

7.  Orthographic and phonological priming effects in the same-different task.

Authors:  Sachiko Kinoshita; Michael Gayed; Dennis Norris
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Developmental Differences in the Relationship Between Visual Attention Span and Chinese Reading Fluency.

Authors:  Chen Huang; Maria Luisa Lorusso; Zheng Luo; Jing Zhao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-11-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.