Literature DB >> 12695731

Placebo response and antidepressant clinical trial outcome.

Arif Khan1, Michael Detke, Shirin R F Khan, Craig Mallinckrodt.   

Abstract

Placebo response magnitude is suspected to affect the outcome of antidepressant clinical trials. To evaluate this, 52 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials obtained from the FDA were examined to correlate placebo response magnitude with trial outcome. The magnitude of symptom reduction, percentage mean change from baseline in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), was assessed for patients assigned to placebo or an antidepressant. Correlation coefficients between symptom reduction with placebo and antidepressants and between symptom reduction with placebo and magnitude of advantage of antidepressants over placebo were assessed. A statistically significant positive correlation was seen between placebo and antidepressant response magnitude (r =.40, p <.001) and between placebo response magnitude and the advantage of antidepressants over placebo (r = -.592, p <.0001). Only 21.1% of antidepressant treatment arms in trials with high placebo response (>30% mean change from baseline) showed statistical superiority over placebo compared with 74.2% in trials with a low placebo response (< or =30). Response magnitude varies and has an important effect on antidepressant clinical trials, illustrating the need for a placebo arm to determine if the trial was sensitive to treatment differences and highlighting the dangers of cross-study comparisons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12695731     DOI: 10.1097/01.NMD.0000061144.16176.38

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis        ISSN: 0022-3018            Impact factor:   2.254


  35 in total

1.  The placebo effect in clinical trials for alcohol dependence: an exploratory analysis of 51 naltrexone and acamprosate studies.

Authors:  Raye Z Litten; I-Jen P Castle; Daniel Falk; Megan Ryan; Joanne Fertig; Chiung M Chen; Hsiao-ye Yi
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Treatment-Resistant Major Depression in US Veterans: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jerome A Yesavage; J Kaci Fairchild; Zhibao Mi; Kousick Biswas; Anne Davis-Karim; Ciaran S Phibbs; Steven D Forman; Michael Thase; Leanne M Williams; Amit Etkin; Ruth O'Hara; Gerald Georgette; Tamara Beale; Grant D Huang; Art Noda; Mark S George
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 21.596

3.  Placebo response rates and potential modifiers in double-blind randomized controlled trials of second and newer generation antidepressants for major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Ramona Meister; Mariam Abbas; Jochen Antel; Triinu Peters; Yiqi Pan; Ulrike Bingel; Yvonne Nestoriuc; Johannes Hebebrand
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2018-12-08       Impact factor: 4.785

4.  A Novel Methodology to Estimate the Treatment Effect in Presence of Highly Variable Placebo Response.

Authors:  Roberto Gomeni; Navin Goyal; Françoise Bressolle; Maurizio Fava
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  Has the rising placebo response impacted antidepressant clinical trial outcome? Data from the US Food and Drug Administration 1987-2013.

Authors:  Arif Khan; Kaysee Fahl Mar; Jim Faucett; Shirin Khan Schilling; Walter A Brown
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 49.548

6.  Exposure-response modeling of anti-depressant treatments: the confounding role of placebo effect.

Authors:  Navin Goyal; Roberto Gomeni
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 7.  Identifying genetic loci affecting antidepressant drug response in depression using drug-gene interaction models.

Authors:  Raymond Noordam; Christy L Avery; Loes E Visser; Bruno H Stricker
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.533

8.  [Transcranial magnetic stimulation for comorbid depression in anorexia].

Authors:  S Kamolz; M M Richter; A Schmidtke; A J Fallgatter
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.214

9.  Study design affects participant expectations: a survey.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Scott Alan Rose; Joel R Sneed; Steven P Roose
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.153

10.  The efficacy of duloxetine: a comprehensive summary of results from MMRM and LOCF_ANCOVA in eight clinical trials.

Authors:  Craig H Mallinckrodt; Joel Raskin; Madelaine M Wohlreich; John G Watkin; Michael J Detke
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2004-09-08       Impact factor: 3.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.