Literature DB >> 16418846

Oculomotor responses to gradual changes in target direction.

Leigh A Mrotek1, Martha Flanders, John F Soechting.   

Abstract

Smooth pursuit tracking of targets moving linearly (in one dimension) is well characterized by a model where retinal image motion drives eye acceleration. However, previous findings suggest that this model cannot be simply extended to two-dimensional (2D) tracking. To examine 2D pursuit, in the present study, human subjects tracked a target that moved linearly and then followed the arc of a circle. The subjects' gaze angular velocity accurately matched target angular velocity, but the direction of smooth pursuit always lagged behind the current target direction. Pursuit speed slowly declined after the onset of the curve (for about 500 ms), even though the target speed was constant. In a second experiment, brief perturbations were presented immediately prior to the beginning of the change in direction. The subjects' responses to these perturbations consisted of two components: (1) a response specific to the parameters of the perturbation and (2) a nonspecific response that always consisted of a transient decrease in gaze velocity. With the exception of this nonspecific response, pursuit behavior in response to the gradual changes in direction and to the perturbations could be explained by using retinal slip (image velocity) as the input signal. The retinal slip was parallel and perpendicular to the instantaneous direction of pursuit ultimately resulted in changes in gaze velocity (via gaze acceleration). Perhaps due to the subjects' expectations that the target will curve, the sensitivity to the image motion in the direction of pursuit was not as strong as the sensitivity to image motion perpendicular to gaze velocity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16418846     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0326-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  36 in total

1.  Similarity in the response of smooth pursuit and manual tracking to a change in the direction of target motion.

Authors:  K C Engel; J H Anderson; J F Soechting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Kinematic analysis of manual tracking in monkeys: characterization of movement intermittencies during a circular tracking task.

Authors:  A V Roitman; S G Massaquoi; K Takahashi; T J Ebner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Interception of targets using brief directional cues.

Authors:  Leigh A Mrotek; Martha Flanders; John F Soechting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Human ocular pursuit during the transient disappearance of a visual target.

Authors:  Simon J Bennett; Graham R Barnes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Oculomotor tracking in two dimensions.

Authors:  K C Engel; J H Anderson; J F Soechting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Generation of smooth-pursuit eye movements: neuronal mechanisms and pathways.

Authors:  E L Keller; S J Heinen
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.304

7.  A model of visually-guided smooth pursuit eye movements based on behavioral observations.

Authors:  R J Krauzlis; S G Lisberger
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.621

8.  Initial tracking conditions modulate the gain of visuo-motor transmission for smooth pursuit eye movements in monkeys.

Authors:  J D Schwartz; S G Lisberger
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.241

9.  The upper limit of human smooth pursuit velocity.

Authors:  C H Meyer; A G Lasker; D A Robinson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Relationship between eye acceleration and retinal image velocity during foveal smooth pursuit in man and monkey.

Authors:  S G Lisberger; C Evinger; G W Johanson; A F Fuchs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  10 in total

1.  Predicting curvilinear target motion through an occlusion.

Authors:  Leigh A Mrotek; John F Soechting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Inference of complex human motion requires internal models of action: behavioral evidence.

Authors:  Ghislain Saunier; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Claudia D Vargas; Thierry Pozzo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Models for the extrapolation of target motion for manual interception.

Authors:  John F Soechting; John Z Juveli; Hrishikesh M Rao
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Discrimination of curvature from motion during smooth pursuit eye movements and fixation.

Authors:  Nicholas M Ross; Alexander Goettker; Alexander C Schütz; Doris I Braun; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Learning the trajectory of a moving visual target and evolution of its tracking in the monkey.

Authors:  Clara Bourrelly; Julie Quinet; Patrick Cavanagh; Laurent Goffart
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Incorporating prediction in models for two-dimensional smooth pursuit.

Authors:  John F Soechting; Hrishikesh M Rao; John Z Juveli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Following and intercepting scribbles: interactions between eye and hand control.

Authors:  Leigh A Mrotek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Target interception: hand-eye coordination and strategies.

Authors:  Leigh A Mrotek; John F Soechting
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Anisotropies in the gain of smooth pursuit during two-dimensional tracking as probed by brief perturbations.

Authors:  Stephen J Kerrigan; John F Soechting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 2.064

10.  Gaze behavior in one-handed catching and its relation with interceptive performance: what the eyes can't tell.

Authors:  Benedetta Cesqui; Maura Mezzetti; Francesco Lacquaniti; Andrea d'Avella
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.