Literature DB >> 12692678

Performance of Web-based image distribution: server-oriented measurements.

B Bergh1, M Pietsch, A Schlaefke, I Garcia, T J Vogl.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the performance of Web-based image distribution when multiple personal computers (PCs) are downloading images simultaneously for different server hardware configurations. Using specially developed software, the time-to-display (TTD) of different image types was measured with up to 16 concurrent PCs for various combinations of processor, random access memory (RAM), network connection and image compression. The TTD increased linearly with the number of concurrent PCs but remained under 5 s in most of the cases, even with 16 concurrent PCs. Only with a 10-Mbit/s network connection or with lossy compression were TTDs above 5 s obtained. Two processors instead of one led to a slight and constant improvement of the TTD. Reducing the amount of RAM increased the TTD mainly for computed radiography (CR) images. There was no difference between a 200- and 100-Mbit/s network, but 10 Mbit/s proved significantly worse. When increasing the number of clients lossless compression performed substantially better than lossy. A standard off-the-shelf server provides an appropriate download performance even with 16 concurrent clients. Processor speed and RAM amount are of minor importance, but it is highly recommended to use a 100-Mbit/s network connection and to avoid the application of on-demand lossy compression in a local area network.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12692678     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-1880-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  19 in total

1.  A hospital-wide distributed PACS based on intranet.

Authors:  D Bandon; Y Ligier; G Trayser; C Girard; M Logean; O Ratib
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  1998

2.  Implementing a Java-based image and report distribution system in a non-picture archiving and communication system environment.

Authors:  G Wendt; T Kulbago; W Peppler
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  [Internet technology for clinical applications in a digital radiography department].

Authors:  B Bergh; M Pietsch; T J Vogl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  Networks in the radiology department and the hospital.

Authors:  E Pelikan; E Kotter; U Timmermann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Web and PACS: heralding the new age of imaging in the health care community.

Authors:  F Terrier
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug

6.  Intranet and radiology: a critical appraisal of radiological applications of Intranet technology.

Authors:  Steffen Achenbach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-07-04       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Introduction to the DICOM standard.

Authors:  Peter Mildenberger; Marco Eichelberg; Eric Martin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Enterprise-scale image distribution with a Web PACS.

Authors:  A Gropper; S Doyle; K Dreyer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Using WWW and JAVA for image access and interactive viewing in an integrated PACS.

Authors:  E Bellon; J Wauters; J Fernàndez-Bayó; M Feron; K Verstreken; J Van Cleynenbreugel; B Van den Bosch; M Desmaret; G Marchal; P Suetens
Journal:  Med Inform (Lond)       Date:  1997 Oct-Dec

10.  World Wide Web interface to digital imaging and communication in medicine-capable image servers.

Authors:  G C Browning; Y Liang; K A Buckwalter; R A Kruger; A Aisen
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.056

View more
  4 in total

1.  Upload capacity and time-to-display of an image Web system during simultaneous up- and download processes.

Authors:  B Bergh; M Pietsch; A Schlaefke; I Garcia; T J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Development and evaluation of different methods to assess download and display time of image web systems.

Authors:  M Pietsch; A Schlaefke; T J Vogl; B Bergh
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Visualization of data in radiotherapy using web services for optimization of workflow.

Authors:  Stefan Kirrmann; Mark Gainey; Fred Röhner; Markus Hall; Gregor Bruggmoser; Marianne Schmucker; Felix E Heinemann
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Performance enhancement of a web-based picture archiving and communication system using commercial off-the-shelf server clusters.

Authors:  Yan-Lin Liu; Cheng-Ting Shih; Yuan-Jen Chang; Shu-Jun Chang; Jay Wu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.