Literature DB >> 14531003

Upload capacity and time-to-display of an image Web system during simultaneous up- and download processes.

B Bergh1, M Pietsch, A Schlaefke, I Garcia, T J Vogl.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the up- and download performance of an image Web system (IWS) during simultaneous up- and download procedures. Following preparatory tests, the upload capacity (UC) with and without simultaneous download and the time-to-display (TTD) with and without simultaneous upload were determined for different image, server and compression types, and with up to 16 concurrent clients. The UC varied between 1.7-5.5 Gigabyte per hour (GB/h) and was slightly influenced by a simultaneous download; however, the TTDs were substantially prolonged during an upload and only below 5 s with up to four to six concurrent clients. The choice of image and server type had a strong impact on UC and TTD. Lossy primary compression proved slightly superior. An effective UC of approximately 4.0 GB/h or 96 Gigabyte per day (GB/day) can be achieved, which appears suitable even for large institutions. Because of its substantial influence on UC and TTD during simultaneous up- and download, the server hardware should be equipped with two processors and 1 GB RAM. Lossy primary compression may be used with slight performance benefits when full-resolution images are not required. The upload is a time-demanding process, and it is possible that during peak hours the waiting times are unacceptable for clinicians.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14531003     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-2059-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  20 in total

1.  A hospital-wide distributed PACS based on intranet.

Authors:  D Bandon; Y Ligier; G Trayser; C Girard; M Logean; O Ratib
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  1998

2.  Year 2000: status of picture archiving and digital imaging in European hospitals.

Authors:  K Foord
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  [The PACS concept of the University of Regensburg].

Authors:  R Fründ; J Techert; M Strotzer; W Börner; A Tsakpinis; S Feuerbach
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2001-04

4.  Introduction to the DICOM standard.

Authors:  Peter Mildenberger; Marco Eichelberg; Eric Martin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Web-based viewing of picture archiving and communications systems images--Part II: The effect of compression on speed of transmission.

Authors:  W F Bennett; D G Spigos; M T Tzalonikou; J E Terrell; M A Augustyn
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Performance of Web-based image distribution: client-oriented measurements.

Authors:  B Bergh; M Pietsch; A Schlaefke; T J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Delivering images to the operating room: a web-based solution.

Authors:  W F Bennett; K M Tunstall; P W Skinner; D G Spigos
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2002-03-21       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Impact of multislice CT on PACS resources.

Authors:  Eric P Tamm; Steve Thompson; Steven L Venable; Kevin McEnery
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Challenges in image acquisition and distribution for clinical image service.

Authors:  David L Melson; Stephen M Moore; James G Blaine; Kenneth W Clark; Sarbjit Sadhra; Hartwig Blume
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2002-03-21       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Using WWW and JAVA for image access and interactive viewing in an integrated PACS.

Authors:  E Bellon; J Wauters; J Fernàndez-Bayó; M Feron; K Verstreken; J Van Cleynenbreugel; B Van den Bosch; M Desmaret; G Marchal; P Suetens
Journal:  Med Inform (Lond)       Date:  1997 Oct-Dec
View more
  4 in total

1.  Development and evaluation of a new gray-scale test pattern to adjust gradients of thoracic CT imaging.

Authors:  M Yamaguchi; H Fujita; M Uemura; Y Asai; H Wakae; M Ishifuro
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Development and evaluation of different methods to assess download and display time of image web systems.

Authors:  M Pietsch; A Schlaefke; T J Vogl; B Bergh
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Enterprise imaging and multi-departmental PACS.

Authors:  Björn Bergh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Performance enhancement of a web-based picture archiving and communication system using commercial off-the-shelf server clusters.

Authors:  Yan-Lin Liu; Cheng-Ting Shih; Yuan-Jen Chang; Shu-Jun Chang; Jay Wu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.