Literature DB >> 12691767

Visual marking: using time in visual selection.

Derrick G. Watson1, Glyn W. Humphreys, Christian N.L. Olivers.   

Abstract

Given human capacity limitations, to behave adaptively we need to prioritise the order of visual processing to ensure that the most relevant information is available to control action. One way to do this is to prioritise processing at a particular location in space. However, there are many situations where this strategy is not possible and recent studies have shown that, in such circumstances, observers can use time as well as space to prioritise selection. We propose that selection by time can be influenced by a process of visual marking, involving an active bias applied in parallel against old items in the field. Here we describe the properties of visual marking in relation to other mechanisms of visual selection.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 12691767     DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00033-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  13 in total

1.  Different effects of the two types of spatial pre-cueing: what precisely is "attention" in Di Lollo's and Enns' substitution masking theory?

Authors:  I Luiga; T Bachmann
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-27

2.  Eye movements and time-based selection: where do the eyes go in preview search?

Authors:  Derrick G Watson; Matthew Inglis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

3.  Visual marking and change detection.

Authors:  Jose L Herrero; Ros Crawley; Cees van Leeuwen; Antonino Raffone
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-08-18

4.  Visual short-term memory guides infants' visual attention.

Authors:  Samantha G Mitsven; Lisa M Cantrell; Steven J Luck; Lisa M Oakes
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-04-25

5.  Spreading suppression and the guidance of search by movement: evidence from negative color carry-over effects.

Authors:  Kevin Dent; Glyn W Humphreys; Jason J Braithwaite
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-08

6.  Target templates: the precision of mental representations affects attentional guidance and decision-making in visual search.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Cortical Mechanisms of Prioritizing Selection for Rejection in Visual Search.

Authors:  Sarah E Donohue; Mandy V Bartsch; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Mircea A Schoenfeld; Jens-Max Hopf
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  A Drastic Change in Background Luminance or Motion Degrades the Preview Benefit.

Authors:  Takayuki Osugi; Ikuya Murakami
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-24

9.  Attentional Capture to a Singleton Distractor Degrades Visual Marking in Visual Search.

Authors:  Kenji Yamauchi; Takayuki Osugi; Ikuya Murakami
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-16

10.  Subset selective search on the basis of color and preview.

Authors:  Mieke Donk
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.