Yasushi Shimada1, Daisuke Kikushima, Junji Tagami. 1. Department of Restorative Sciences, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Yushima, Tokyo, Japan. shimada.ope@tmd.ac.jp
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the micro-shear bond strength of current adhesive systems to cervical and mid-coronal enamel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two commercially available resin adhesives were investigated; a self-etching primer system (Clearfil SE Bond) and a one-bottle adhesive system (Single Bond) intended for use with the total-etch wet-bonding technique were employed. Two regions of enamel, cervical and mid-coronal regions, were chosen from the buccal surface of extracted molars and were then bonded with each adhesive system and submitted to the micro-shear bond test. In addition, the conditioned enamel surfaces without any bond and the enamel-resin adhesive interfaces were studied morphologically using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the adhesive systems used (P > 0.05). However, for both bonding systems, cervical enamel showed significantly lower bonding than mid-coronal enamel (P < 0.05). The relatively lower bond strengths obtained from cervical enamel probably resulted from its aprismatic structure, which appears to be more resistant to dissolving in acids than prismatic mid-coronal enamel.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the micro-shear bond strength of current adhesive systems to cervical and mid-coronal enamel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two commercially available resin adhesives were investigated; a self-etching primer system (Clearfil SE Bond) and a one-bottle adhesive system (Single Bond) intended for use with the total-etch wet-bonding technique were employed. Two regions of enamel, cervical and mid-coronal regions, were chosen from the buccal surface of extracted molars and were then bonded with each adhesive system and submitted to the micro-shear bond test. In addition, the conditioned enamel surfaces without any bond and the enamel-resin adhesive interfaces were studied morphologically using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the adhesive systems used (P > 0.05). However, for both bonding systems, cervical enamel showed significantly lower bonding than mid-coronal enamel (P < 0.05). The relatively lower bond strengths obtained from cervical enamel probably resulted from its aprismatic structure, which appears to be more resistant to dissolving in acids than prismatic mid-coronal enamel.
Authors: Rubens C R de Carvalho; Patricia M de Freitas; Masayuki Otsuki; Carlos P de Eduardo; Junji Tagami Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2007-05-04 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Dinesh D S Weerasinghe; Toru Nikaido; Shizuko Ichinose; Kanchana G P Waidyasekara; Junji Tagami Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2007-02-01 Impact factor: 4.727
Authors: Andrea Mello de Andrade; Sandra Kiss Moura; Alessandra Reis; Alessandro Dourado Loguercio; Eugenio Jose Garcia; Rosa Helena Miranda Grande Journal: J Appl Oral Sci Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 2.698
Authors: Andrea M Andrade; Eugenio Garcia; Sandra Kiss Moura; Alessandra Reis; Alessandro Loguercio; Luciana Mendonça Silva; Gustavo H D Pimentel; Rosa Helena Miranda Grande Journal: Int J Dent Date: 2012-11-04