Literature DB >> 12689777

Cross-sectional area of the lumbar back muscles as a function of torso flexion.

M J Jorgensen1, W S Marras, P Gupta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Quantification of the maximum anatomical cross-sectional area of the lumbar back muscles as a function of torso flexion angle and development of prediction equations as a function of torso flexion and anthropometric measures.
BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional areas of the lumbar back muscles used as inputs into biomechanical models have traditionally been derived from subjects lying in the neutral supine posture. However, it is known that the cross-sectional area of muscle is altered as the torso angle changes.
DESIGN: Experimental design consisted of a two-factor multivariate analysis of variance on the cross-sectional area of the lumbar torso muscle across the lumbar levels, as a function of gender and torso angle. Hierarchical linear regression was utilized to assess the association between cross-sectional area and individual and torso posture characteristics.
METHOD: Axial MRI scans, through and parallel to each of the lumbar intervertebral discs at four torso flexion positions were obtained from subjects in a lateral recumbent posture. Cross-sectional areas were quantified and converted into anatomical cross-sectional areas utilizing known fascicle orientations.
RESULTS: The maximum anatomical cross-sectional area was located between the L(3)/L(4) and L(4)/L(5) level in the neutral posture. The anatomical cross-sectional areas at the L(4)/L(5) and L(5)/S(1) decreased during torso flexion, however, the percent change varied as a function of the individual level. The majority of the anatomical cross-sectional area variability was explained by gender and body mass. Lumbar curvature explained a larger proportion of the anatomical cross-sectional area variability at the lower lumbar levels than at the higher lumbar levels.
CONCLUSIONS: The maximum anatomical cross-sectional area of the lumbar back muscles occur at the neutral torso posture and did not decrease as a function of torso flexion. When using maximum anatomical cross-sectional area or specific lumbar level anatomical cross-sectional areas, it appears necessary to account for gender and body mass. At the lower lumbar levels, knowledge of spinal curvature plays an increasing role in the estimation of the size of the lumbar torso muscle cross-sectional area. RELEVANCE: This research indicates the lower lumbar level trunk muscle anatomical cross-sectional area decrease as torso flexion increases, however, the maximum lumbar trunk muscle anatomical cross-sectional area does not vary as a function of torso flexion. Accounting for gender, body mass, torso characteristics and lumbar curvature may help increase accuracy of anatomical cross-sectional area prediction, as well as muscle force predictions from biomechanical models.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12689777     DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(03)00027-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  11 in total

1.  Interface stability influences torso muscle recruitment and spinal load during pushing tasks.

Authors:  P J Lee; K P Granata
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Regressions for estimating muscle parameters in the thoracic and lumbar trunk for use in musculoskeletal modeling.

Authors:  Dennis E Anderson; John M D'Agostino; Alexander G Bruno; Rajaram K Manoharan; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging measurements of the cross-sectional area of the muscle contractile and non-contractile components.

Authors:  Olivier Gille; Mathieu-Panchoa de Sèze; Patrick Guérin; Erwan Jolivet; Jean-Marc Vital; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Incorporation of CT-based measurements of trunk anatomy into subject-specific musculoskeletal models of the spine influences vertebral loading predictions.

Authors:  Alexander G Bruno; Hossein Mokhtarzadeh; Brett T Allaire; Kelsey R Velie; M Clara De Paolis Kaluza; Dennis E Anderson; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Preliminary investigation of spinal level and postural effects on thoracic muscle morphology with upright open MRI.

Authors:  Anoosha Pai S; Honglin Zhang; John Street; David R Wilson; Stephen H M Brown; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2021-02-08

6.  The relationship between sagittal curvature and extensor muscle volume in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Judith R Meakin; Jonathan Fulford; Richard Seymour; Joanne R Welsman; Karen M Knapp
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 7.  Relationship between the hip and low back pain in athletes who participate in rotation-related sports.

Authors:  Marcie Harris-Hayes; Shirley A Sahrmann; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  J Sport Rehabil       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.931

8.  Synchronization of Non-linear Oscillators for Neurobiologically Inspired Control on a Bionic Parallel Waist of Legged Robot.

Authors:  Yaguang Zhu; Shuangjie Zhou; Dongxiao Gao; Qiong Liu
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Changes of paraspinal muscles in postmenopausal osteoporotic spinal compression fractures: magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Jong Yun Kim; Soo Uk Chae; Gang Deuk Kim; Myoung Soo Cha
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2013-11-18

10.  The Effects of Spinopelvic Parameters and Paraspinal Muscle Degeneration on S1 Screw Loosening.

Authors:  Jin-Bum Kim; Seung-Won Park; Young-Seok Lee; Taek-Kyun Nam; Yong-Sook Park; Young-Baeg Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-10-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.