Literature DB >> 12688416

Selection of data sets for QSARs: analyses of Tetrahymena toxicity from aromatic compounds.

T W Schultz1, T I Netzeva, M T D Cronin.   

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to develop a strategy for the formulation of a valid ecotoxicological-based QSAR while, at the same time, minimizing the required number of toxicological data points. Two chemical selection approaches-distance-based optimality and K Nearest Neighbor (KNN), were used to examine the impact of the number of compounds used in the training and testing phases of QSAR development (i.e. diversity and representivity, respectively) on the predictivity (i.e. external validation) of the QSAR. Regression-based QSARs for the ectotoxic potency for population growth impairment of aromatic compounds (benzenes) to the aquatic ciliate Tetrahymena pyriformis were developed based on descriptors for chemical hydrophobicity and electrophilicity. A ratio of one compound in the training set to three in the test set was applied. The results indicate that from a known chemical universe, in this case 385 derivatives, robust QSARs of equal quality may be developed from a small number of diverse compounds, validated by a representative test set. As a conservative recommendation it is suggested that there should be a minimum of 10 observations for each variable in a QSAR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12688416     DOI: 10.1080/1062936021000058782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res        ISSN: 1026-776X            Impact factor:   3.000


  9 in total

1.  Prediction of toxicity using a novel RBF neural network training methodology.

Authors:  Georgia Melagraki; Antreas Afantitis; Kalliopi Makridima; Haralambos Sarimveis; Olga Igglessi-Markopoulou
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  A novel RBF neural network training methodology to predict toxicity to Vibrio fischeri.

Authors:  Georgia Melagraki; Antreas Afantitis; Haralambos Sarimveis; Olga Igglessi-Markopoulou; Alex Alexandridis
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 2.943

3.  From data point timelines to a well curated data set, data mining of experimental data and chemical structure data from scientific articles, problems and possible solutions.

Authors:  Villu Ruusmann; Uko Maran
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 4.  Considerations and recent advances in QSAR models for cytochrome P450-mediated drug metabolism prediction.

Authors:  Haiyan Li; Jin Sun; Xiaowen Fan; Xiaofan Sui; Lan Zhang; Yongjun Wang; Zhonggui He
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Ecotoxicity evaluation of a WWTP effluent treated by solar photo-Fenton at neutral pH in a raceway pond reactor.

Authors:  A M Freitas; G Rivas; M C Campos-Mañas; J L Casas López; A Agüera; J A Sánchez Pérez
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic models: integration of in silico approaches with micro cell culture analogues.

Authors:  A Chen; M L Yarmush; T Maguire
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.731

7.  Use of cell viability assay data improves the prediction accuracy of conventional quantitative structure-activity relationship models of animal carcinogenicity.

Authors:  Hao Zhu; Ivan Rusyn; Ann Richard; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Estimation of the Toxicity of Different Substituted Aromatic Compounds to the Aquatic Ciliate Tetrahymena pyriformis by QSAR Approach.

Authors:  Feng Luan; Ting Wang; Lili Tang; Shuang Zhang; M Natália Dias Soeiro Cordeiro
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 4.411

9.  On two novel parameters for validation of predictive QSAR models.

Authors:  Partha Pratim Roy; Somnath Paul; Indrani Mitra; Kunal Roy
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 4.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.