Literature DB >> 12446985

Map error reduction: using genetic and sequence-based physical maps to order closely linked markers.

Andrew T DeWan1, Antonio R Parrado, Tara C Matise, Suzanne M Leal.   

Abstract

The Marshfield comprehensive genetic maps are frequently used for linkage and association studies, however, for some regions of these maps the marker order has low level of likelihood ratio support. In order to investigate the level of statistical support and the accuracy of the genetic maps compared to sequence-based physical maps, two approximately 30 cM autosomal regions were selected. The first region was selected from chromosome 3 and consisted predominately of draft sequence. The second region was selected from chromosome 21 and consisted of finished sequence data. The physical order of these markers was based upon their position on Celera (CEL) and Human Genome Project-Santa Cruz (HGP-sc) sequence-based physical maps. The chromosome 3 and 21 regions contained 100 and 61 markers, respectively, on the Marshfield genetic map. The genetic and physical map order was consistent for 88.9 and 89.2% of the markers in the region on chromosome 3 and 21, respectively. Using a novel scoring criterion to assess inconsistent marker order between genetic and physical maps, it was determined that the physical order was likely the correct order for 3.3 and 7.1% of the markers in the chromosome 3 and 21 regions, respectively. To increase the accuracy of the order of markers selected for fine mapping a method is presented which combines information from genetic and sequence-based physical maps. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12446985      PMCID: PMC6143171          DOI: 10.1159/000066697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Hered        ISSN: 0001-5652            Impact factor:   0.444


  20 in total

1.  Linkage analysis in the presence of errors III: marker loci and their map as nuisance parameters.

Authors:  H H Göring; J D Terwilliger
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03-23       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Computational comparison of two draft sequences of the human genome.

Authors:  J Aach; M L Bulyk; G M Church; J Comander; A Derti; J Shendure
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  LDB2000: sequence-based integrated maps of the human genome.

Authors:  X Ke; W Tapper; A Collins
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Issues concerning association studies for fine mapping a susceptibility gene for a complex disease.

Authors:  N Kaplan; R Morris
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  On the relative importance of marker heterozygosity and intermarker distance in gene mapping.

Authors:  J D Terwilliger; Y Ding; J Ott
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.736

6.  Comparison of human genetic and sequence-based physical maps.

Authors:  A Yu; C Zhao; Y Fan; W Jang; A J Mungall; P Deloukas; A Olsen; N A Doggett; N Ghebranious; K W Broman; J L Weber
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  High-resolution multipoint linkage-disequilibrium mapping in the context of a human genome sequence.

Authors:  B Rannala; J P Reeve
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  The map problem: a comparison of genetic and sequence-based physical maps.

Authors:  Andrew T DeWan; Antonio R Parrado; Tara C Matise; Suzanne M Leal
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-11-09       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Comprehensive human genetic maps: individual and sex-specific variation in recombination.

Authors:  K W Broman; J C Murray; V C Sheffield; R L White; J L Weber
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Construction of multilocus genetic linkage maps in humans.

Authors:  E S Lander; P Green
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

1.  Genetic maps of microsatellite and single-nucleotide polymorphism markers: are the distances accurate?

Authors:  Suzanne M Leal
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.135

2.  An updated 'Essex' by 'Forrest' linkage map and first composite interval map of QTL underlying six soybean traits.

Authors:  M A Kassem; J Shultz; K Meksem; Y Cho; A J Wood; M J Iqbal; D A Lightfoot
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Characterizing uncertainty in high-density maps from multiparental populations.

Authors:  Daniel Ahfock; Ian Wood; Stuart Stephen; Colin R Cavanagh; B Emma Huang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Optimizing the evidence for linkage by permuting marker order.

Authors:  Gyungah Jun; Yeunjoo Song; Sudha K Iyengar; Robert C Elston
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 2.797

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.