Literature DB >> 12686830

Anatomical correction of vaginal vault prolapse by uterosacral ligament fixation in women who also require a pubovaginal sling.

Cindy L Amundsen1, Brian J Flynn, George D Webster.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We describe the anatomical and functional outcome in patients who underwent vaginal vault fixation to the proximal uterosacral ligaments for the treatment of vault prolapse and who also required a concomitant pubovaginal sling for associated stress urinary incontinence as well as the repair of other sector defects.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 33 patients who underwent such repairs between November 1998 and December 2001. Endopelvic fascial defects were described using the pelvic organ prolapse quantitative system (POPQ). Outcome measures included anatomical and functional assessment of pelvic floor defects and urinary incontinence.
RESULTS: Preoperatively all patients complained of a vaginal bulge and stress urinary incontinence, while 17 of the 33 had urge incontinence, and 24 and 9 had POPQ stage III or IV and stage II prolapse, respectively. Mean followup was 28 months (range 6 to 43). There was significant improvement in all POPQ measurements (p <0.05). Most notably vaginal cuff support improved by a mean of 7 cm. Stages IIAp (rectocele) and IIC (cuff) prolapse developed in 4 and 2 failed cases, respectively. Stress urinary incontinence was cured in all 33 patients and urge incontinence was cured in 14 of 17, while in 27 vaginal prolapse symptoms resolved and most had improved defecation dysfunction. No patients had urinary obstructive symptoms. There were no ureteral, bladder or rectal complications but 1 patient required blood transfusion.
CONCLUSIONS: Suspension of the vaginal cuff to the proximal uterosacral ligaments with site specific repair of other associated endopelvic fascial defects provides excellent anatomical and functional correction of vault prolapse. Furthermore, a concomitant pubovaginal sling is a compatible repair for associated stress urinary incontinence. It did not compromise vaginal repair and prolapse repair did not jeopardize the outcome of the sling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12686830     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000061472.94183.26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  28 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of pelvic ligaments: a biomechanics study.

Authors:  Géraldine Rivaux; Chrystèle Rubod; Bruno Dedet; Mathias Brieu; Boris Gabriel; Michel Cosson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Surgical anatomy of the uterosacral ligament.

Authors:  Dzung Vu; Bernard T Haylen; Kelly Tse; Annabelle Farnsworth
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Evaluation of Different 'Tensioning' of Apical Suspension in Women Undergoing Surgery for Prolapse and Urinary Incontinence.

Authors:  Sebastian Ludwig; Samira Göktepe; Peter Mallmann; Wolfram Jäger
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Relationship of the uterosacral ligament to the sacral plexus and to the pudendal nerve.

Authors:  Sohail A Siddique; Robert E Gutman; Miguel A Schön Ybarra; Francisco Rojas; Victoria L Handa
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-05-30

Review 5.  Severe cystocele: optimizing results.

Authors:  Jennifer T Anger; Shlomo Raz; Larissa V Rodríguez
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Comparative histological analysis of anterior vaginal wall in women with pelvic organ prolapse or control subjects. A pilot study.

Authors:  Wassim Badiou; Guillaume Granier; Philippe-Jean Bousquet; Xavier Monrozies; Pierre Mares; Renaud de Tayrac
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-01-09

7.  Operations and pelvic muscle training in the management of apical support loss (OPTIMAL) trial: design and methods.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Linda Brubaker; Shawn Menefee; Peggy Norton; Diane Borello-France; Edward Varner; Joseph Schaffer; Alison Weidner; Xiao Xu; Cathie Spino; Anne Weber
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Midline uterosacral plication anterior colporrhaphy combo (MUSPACC): preliminary surgical report.

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Vivian Yang; Dzung Vu; Kelly Tse
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  International Urogynecology Consultation Chapter 1 Committee 5: relationship of pelvic organ prolapse to associated pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms: lower urinary tract, bowel, sexual dysfunction and abdominopelvic pain.

Authors:  Marie-Andrée Harvey; Hui Ju Chih; Roxana Geoffrion; Baharak Amir; Alka Bhide; Pawel Miotla; Peter F W M Rosier; Ifeoma Offiah; Manidip Pal; Alexandriah Nicole Alas
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Uterosacral colpopexy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy: comparison of laparoscopic and vaginal approaches.

Authors:  Charles R Rardin; Elisabeth A Erekson; Vivian W Sung; Renee M Ward; Deborah L Myers
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 0.142

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.