Friedhelm Hummel1, Rolf Kirsammer, Christian Gerloff. 1. Cortical Physiology Research Group, Department of Neurology, Eberhard-Karls University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate, if increasing ipsilateral cortical activation during sequential finger movements of increasing complexity relates to the difficulty of transitions ('sequence complexity') or to increasing motor memory load ('sequence length'). METHODS: Pre-learned, memorized sequences (MEM) of different complexities (SIMPLE=e.g., 2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2; SCALE=e.g., 2-5-4-3-2-5-4-3-2-5-4-3-2-5-4-3; and COMPLEX=e.g., 5-3-2-4-3-4-2-5-4-4-2-3-5-2-4-3; 2=index, 5=pinky) were randomly alternated with visually instructed, novel sequences (NOV) of matched complexity. In this design, memory load co-varied with complexity during MEM because of increasing length of the memorized sequences. In NOV, memory load was eliminated because each sequence element was prompted by an instructive visual cue. Cortical activation was measured by spectral power analysis of 28-channel electroencephalogram (EEG) in 15 healthy, right-handed subjects. RESULTS: The increases of ipsilateral sensorimotor activation from SIMPLE over SCALE to COMPLEX in NOV were linearly correlated with the corresponding pattern in MEM (P<0.01). No significant differences were found between MEM and NOV (analysis of variance, n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: The similar dynamics of cortical activation patterns across movement sequences during MEM and NOV indicate that increasing ipsilateral activation primarily reflects processing of increasingly difficult transitions between movements, and not motor memory load. SIGNIFICANCE: Function of ipsilateral sensorimotor areas during complex motor behavior.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate, if increasing ipsilateral cortical activation during sequential finger movements of increasing complexity relates to the difficulty of transitions ('sequence complexity') or to increasing motor memory load ('sequence length'). METHODS: Pre-learned, memorized sequences (MEM) of different complexities (SIMPLE=e.g., 2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2; SCALE=e.g., 2-5-4-3-2-5-4-3-2-5-4-3-2-5-4-3; and COMPLEX=e.g., 5-3-2-4-3-4-2-5-4-4-2-3-5-2-4-3; 2=index, 5=pinky) were randomly alternated with visually instructed, novel sequences (NOV) of matched complexity. In this design, memory load co-varied with complexity during MEM because of increasing length of the memorized sequences. In NOV, memory load was eliminated because each sequence element was prompted by an instructive visual cue. Cortical activation was measured by spectral power analysis of 28-channel electroencephalogram (EEG) in 15 healthy, right-handed subjects. RESULTS: The increases of ipsilateral sensorimotor activation from SIMPLE over SCALE to COMPLEX in NOV were linearly correlated with the corresponding pattern in MEM (P<0.01). No significant differences were found between MEM and NOV (analysis of variance, n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: The similar dynamics of cortical activation patterns across movement sequences during MEM and NOV indicate that increasing ipsilateral activation primarily reflects processing of increasingly difficult transitions between movements, and not motor memory load. SIGNIFICANCE: Function of ipsilateral sensorimotor areas during complex motor behavior.
Authors: Giovanni Di Pino; Giovanni Pellegrino; Giovanni Assenza; Fioravante Capone; Florinda Ferreri; Domenico Formica; Federico Ranieri; Mario Tombini; Ulf Ziemann; John C Rothwell; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2014-09-09 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Cathrin M Buetefisch; Kate Pirog Revill; Linda Shuster; Benjamin Hines; Michael Parsons Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2014-05-21 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Miles Wischnewski; Greg M Kowalski; Farrah Rink; Samir R Belagaje; Marc W Haut; Gerald Hobbs; Cathrin M Buetefisch Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2016-03-09 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Axel Riecker; Klaus Gröschel; Hermann Ackermann; Sonja Schnaudigel; Jan Kassubek; Andreas Kastrup Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 5.038