Literature DB >> 12685529

Initial assessment of a new instrument to measure quality of life at the end of life.

Karen E Steinhauser1, Hayden B Bosworth, Elizabeth C Clipp, Maya McNeilly, Nicholas A Christakis, Joanna Parker, James A Tulsky.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We conducted this study to pilot a new multidimensional instrument to assess the quality of life at the end of life.
METHODS: Items were derived from focus groups and a national survey identifying attributes of the quality of dying. Fifty-four items measured on a five-point Likert scale covered six domains. We administered the instrument to equal numbers of Veteran's Administration (VA) and university medical center outpatients with advanced serious illness. We assessed psychometric properties using factor analysis.
RESULTS: Two hundred patients completed the instrument (response rate, 85%). Diagnoses included cancer (64%), congenital heart failure (CHF) (19.5%), end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (10%) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (6.5%). Seventy-four percent were male, 64% were caucasian, and 34% African American. Item reduction and factor analysis yielded a final instrument with 24 items in 5 distinct domains (overall Cronbach a = 0.83). The first factor (6 items; a = 0.84) measured a sense of completion, particularly through contributions to others. The second factor (7 items; alpha = 0.77) measured relations with the health care system. The third factor (6 items; alpha = 0.77) measured preparation. The fourth factor (4 items; alpha = 0.77) measured symptom severity, and the final factor (2 items; alpha = 0.60) measured affective social support.
CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a new instrument to measure the quality of life at the end of life that assesses empirically derived domains that are of demonstrated importance to dying patients, is acceptable to a seriously ill population, and exhibits excellent psychometric properties. Some items related to completion and preparation represent particularly new contributions to quality-of-life measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12685529     DOI: 10.1089/10966210260499014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  33 in total

1.  New measures to capture end of life concerns in Huntington disease: Meaning and Purpose and Concern with Death and Dying from HDQLIFE (a patient-reported outcomes measurement system).

Authors:  N E Carlozzi; N R Downing; M K McCormack; S G Schilling; J S Perlmutter; E A Hahn; J S Lai; S Frank; K A Quaid; J S Paulsen; D Cella; S M Goodnight; J A Miner; M A Nance
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  A systematic review of measures of end-of-life care and its outcomes.

Authors:  Richard A Mularski; Sydney M Dy; Lisa R Shugarman; Anne M Wilkinson; Joanne Lynn; Paul G Shekelle; Sally C Morton; Virginia C Sun; Ronda G Hughes; Lara K Hilton; Margaret Maglione; Shannon L Rhodes; Cony Rolon; Karl A Lorenz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Measuring health-related quality of life in high-grade glioma patients at the end of life using a proxy-reported retrospective questionnaire.

Authors:  Eefje M Sizoo; Linda Dirven; Jaap C Reijneveld; Tjeerd J Postma; Jan J Heimans; Luc Deliens; H Roeline W Pasman; Martin J B Taphoorn
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Social support among women who died of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jody M Jackson; Sharon J Rolnick; Steve S Coughlin; Christine Neslund-Dudas; Mark C Hornbrook; Jeanne Darbinian; Donald J Bachman; Lisa J Herrinton
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  The Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire (QODD): empirical domains and theoretical perspectives.

Authors:  Lois Downey; J Randall Curtis; William E Lafferty; Jerald R Herting; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Palliative care symptom assessment for patients with cancer in the emergency department: validation of the Screen for Palliative and End-of-life care needs in the Emergency Department instrument.

Authors:  Christopher T Richards; Michael A Gisondi; Chih-Hung Chang; D Mark Courtney; Kirsten G Engel; Linda Emanuel; Tammie Quest
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.947

7.  Palliative Care for Interventional Radiology: An Oncologist's Perspective.

Authors:  Toby C Campbell; Jamie H Von Roenn
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.513

8.  Background and design of the symptom burden in end-stage liver disease patient-caregiver dyad study.

Authors:  Lissi Hansen; Karen S Lyons; Nathan F Dieckmann; Michael F Chang; Shirin Hiatt; Emma Solanki; Christopher S Lee
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.228

9.  Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review of self-administered measurement instruments.

Authors:  Janneke van Roij; Heidi Fransen; Lonneke van de Poll-Franse; Myrte Zijlstra; Natasja Raijmakers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Development of the Quality Data Collection Tool for Prospective Quality Assessment and Reporting in Palliative Care.

Authors:  Arif H Kamal; Janet Bull; Dio Kavalieratos; Jonathan M Nicolla; Laura Roe; Martha Adams; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 2.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.