Literature DB >> 17177041

Social support among women who died of ovarian cancer.

Jody M Jackson1, Sharon J Rolnick, Steve S Coughlin, Christine Neslund-Dudas, Mark C Hornbrook, Jeanne Darbinian, Donald J Bachman, Lisa J Herrinton.   

Abstract

GOALS OF WORK: We investigated the effects of social support in the last 6 months of life for women who died of ovarian cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population included women enrolled in one of three Managed Care Organizations who died of ovarian cancer (1995-2000). Information was collected on demographics, living environment, presence of escorts to oncology encounters, comorbidities, medications, outpatient and inpatient encounters, and referrals to home health and hospice. Two characteristics of social support were examined: living with others and being escorted to one or more oncology visits.
RESULTS: Of 421 subjects, both aspects of social support were known for 345 (82%). Of these, 227 (66%) lived with others and were escorted, 33 (10%) lived with others but were never escorted, 59 (17%) lived alone but were escorted, and 26 (8%) lived alone and never were accompanied. Women living alone were less likely to be taking a psychotropic medication (57% vs 70%, p = 0.021) and were somewhat less likely to receive hospice referral (42% vs 53%, p = 0.054). Women who were never escorted had fewer outpatient encounters (12.60 vs 15.77, p = 0.033) and were less likely to be referred to home health (18% vs 30%, p = 0.046).
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that social support has some beneficial effects on receipt of personal health services. Friends and family may act as proponents for the patient in obtaining services. Health care professionals should be encouraged to assess the cancer patient's social situation and identify areas where help may be needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17177041     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-006-0197-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  40 in total

1.  Mind matters -- group therapy and survival in breast cancer.

Authors:  D Spiegel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-12-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Defining social support in context: a necessary step in improving research, intervention, and practice.

Authors:  Philippa Williams; Lesley Barclay; Virginia Schmied
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2004-09

3.  Quality of life among older survivors of breast cancer.

Authors:  Angela Sammarco
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.592

Review 4.  Efficacy and medical cost offset of psychosocial interventions in cancer care: making the case for economic analyses.

Authors:  Linda E Carlson; Barry D Bultz
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 5.  Social support: a conceptual analysis.

Authors:  C P Langford; J Bowsher; J P Maloney; P P Lillis
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.187

6.  Living arrangements and women's health.

Authors:  O Anson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Ovarian cancer patients' psychological distress: the role of physical impairment, perceived unsupportive family and friend behaviors, perceived control, and self-esteem.

Authors:  Tina R Norton; Sharon L Manne; Stephen Rubin; Enrique Hernandez; John Carlson; Cynthia Bergman; Norman Rosenblum
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  Social networks and quality of life among female long-term colorectal cancer survivors.

Authors:  Amy L Sapp; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Polly A Newcomb; John M Hampton; Carol M Moinpour; Patrick L Remington
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Social networks and social support of recently divorced women.

Authors:  M E Duffy
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 1.462

10.  How successful are oncologists in identifying patient distress, perceived social support, and need for psychosocial counselling?

Authors:  W Söllner; A DeVries; E Steixner; P Lukas; G Sprinzl; G Rumpold; S Maislinger
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

1.  How Many Principles for Public Health Ethics?

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin
Journal:  Open Public Health J       Date:  2008-01-01

2.  Predictors of survival trajectories among women with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Lauren C Peres; Sweta Sinha; Mary K Townsend; Brooke L Fridley; Beth Y Karlan; Susan K Lutgendorf; Eileen Shinn; Anil K Sood; Shelley S Tworoger
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 3.  Issues of ovarian cancer survivors in the USA: a literature review.

Authors:  Katrina F Trivers; Jennifer Rees Patterson; Katherine B Roland; Juan L Rodriguez
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Is social support associated with improved clinical outcomes in geriatric lung cancer patients? Observations from North Central Cancer Treatment Group Studies N9921 and N0222.

Authors:  Aminah Jatoi; Shauna L Hillman; Katie L Allen Ziegler; Philip J Stella; Gamini S Soori; Kendrith M Rowland
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 3.989

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.