Literature DB >> 12684232

Commissioning and quality assurance of the Pinnacle(3) radiotherapy treatment planning system for external beam photons.

J L Bedford1, P J Childs, V Nordmark Hansen, M A Mosleh-Shirazi, F Verhaegen, A P Warrington.   

Abstract

The commissioning of a Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system is described. Four Elekta linear accelerators were commissioned for external beam photons. Measured data were used to derive parameter values for the Pinnacle(3) beam model by (1). fitting a Monte Carlo model of the accelerator head to measured data and then extracting the parameters for the Pinnacle(3) beam model, and by (2). using the auto-modelling facility within Pinnacle(3). Both of these methods yielded dose distributions in accord with published recommendations. A separate small-field beam model, customized for an in-house compact blocking system, was also created, which satisfied appropriate acceptance criteria for stereotactically guided conformal brain treatments. Inhomogeneous, oblique, asymmetrical and irregular fields were also assessed, with calculated and measured doses agreeing to within +/-3%. Dose-volume histogram calculation was found to be accurate to within +/-5% dose or volume for a grid size of 4 mm x 4 mm x 4 mm, with better accuracy being achieved for finer grids. Isocentric doses were compared between Pinnacle(3)'s collapsed cone convolution algorithm and the Bentley-Milan algorithm within the Target-2 treatment planning system. Dose differences were generally less than 3% in the dose prescribed, with larger values for breast plans, where the Pinnacle(3) algorithm calculated scatter more accurately. Pelvic and thoracic plans were also verified using an anthropomorphic phantom, with local dose differences between calculated and delivered dose of up to 8%, but mainly less than 3%, and with no systematic difference. Ionization chamber verifications using START and RT-01 trial procedures demonstrated differences between calculated and measured doses of less than 2%. Following satisfactory performance in the commissioning process, Pinnacle(3) has now been introduced into routine clinical use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12684232     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/42085182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  21 in total

1.  A novel technique to enable experimental validation of deformable dose accumulation.

Authors:  Carolyn J Niu; Warren D Foltz; Michael Velec; Joanne L Moseley; Adil Al-Mayah; Kristy K Brock
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Assessment of the setup dependence of detector response functions for mega-voltage linear accelerators.

Authors:  Christopher Fox; Tom Simon; Bill Simon; James F Dempsey; Darren Kahler; Jatinder R Palta; Chihray Liu; Guanghua Yan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Determination of boundaries between ranges of high and low gradient of beam profile.

Authors:  Jacek Wendykier; Marcin Bieniasiewicz; Aleksandra Grządziel; Tadeusz Jedynak; Wiktor Kośniewski; Marta Reudelsdorf; Piotr Wendykier
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-02-13

4.  Effect of age-dependent bone electron density on the calculated dose distribution from kilovoltage and megavoltage photon and electron radiotherapy in paediatric MRI-only treatment planning.

Authors:  B Zeinali-Rafsanjani; R Faghihi; M A Mosleh-Shirazi; M Saeedi-Moghadam; R Jalli; S Sina
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Using beam profile inflection point in process of treatment planning system verification.

Authors:  Jacek Wendykier; Aleksandra Grządziel; Barbara Bekman; Marcin Bieniasiewicz; Adam Bekman; Piotr Wendykier; Bożena Woźniak; Marta Reudelsdorf; Krzysztof Ślosarek
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-08-12

6.  A validation of carbon fiber imaging couch top modeling in two radiation therapy treatment planning systems: Philips Pinnacle3 and BrainLAB iPlan RT Dose.

Authors:  Christopher F Njeh; Jason Parker; Joseph Spurgin; Elizabeth Rhoe
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Dosimetric and QA aspects of Konrad inverse planning system for commissioning intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Shrikant Deshpande; V K Sathiyanarayanan; Janhavi Bhangle; Kumara Swamy; Sumit Basu
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2007-04

8.  Quality assurance: fundamental reproducibility tests for 3-D treatment-planning systems.

Authors:  Charles M Able; Michael D Thomas
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2005-08-12       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  A simple method to test the geometrical reliability of digital reconstructed radiograph (DRR).

Authors:  Stefania Pallotta; Marta Bucciolini
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  A dosimetric evaluation of flattening filter-free volumetric modulated arc therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Guishan Fu; Minghui Li; Yixin Song; Jianrong Dai
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2014-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.