Literature DB >> 6621306

Biomechanical measures of muscular effort.

J G Andrews.   

Abstract

This paper identifies those particular force and torque quantities that arise most frequently in biomechanical investigations, and which, when appropriately combined with the system's kinematic behavior, appear to be related most directly to muscular effort, i.e., the metabolic cost associated with producing muscle tension, in a joint neighborhood. Depending upon whether the joint distribution problem has been solved, muscular effort is best determined either by the individual variable muscle force magnitudes or by the magnitude of the variable muscle force-dependent component of the resultant joint torque. Discrete biomechanical measures that can be used to represent these continuously-varying scalar functions are identified and examined critically. These include instantaneous measures (e.g., the extremes and other characteristic force, torque, and power values) and interval measures (e.g., average force, torque, and power values, work performed, change in mechanical energy, and linear and angular impulses). If the variation of the effort function is negligible, instantaneous measures may suffice provided there exists a reliable scaling factor relating these quantities to metabolic cost. If the variation of the effort function is appreciable, then properly weighted impulse measures may be the most appropriate because they appear to reflect muscular effort over the widest range of human activities, including those that involve isometric contractions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6621306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  6 in total

Review 1.  Quantification of quadriceps and hamstring antagonist activity.

Authors:  E Kellis
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Muscle function during brief maximal exercise: accurate measurements on a friction-loaded cycle ergometer.

Authors:  L M Arsac; A Belli; J R Lacour
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

3.  When Jump Height is not a Good Indicator of Lower Limb Maximal Power Output: Theoretical Demonstration, Experimental Evidence and Practical Solutions.

Authors:  Jean-Benoit Morin; Pedro Jiménez-Reyes; Matt Brughelli; Pierre Samozino
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Foot force direction in an isometric pushing task: prediction by kinematic and musculoskeletal models.

Authors:  M W Schmidt; C López-Ortiz; P S Barrett; L M Rogers; K G Gruben
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  A dynamometer for evaluation of dynamic muscle work.

Authors:  C Bosco; A Belli; M Astrua; J Tihanyi; R Pozzo; S Kellis; O Tsarpela; C Foti; R Manno; C Tranquilli
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1995

6.  Key components of mechanical work predict outcomes in robotic stroke therapy.

Authors:  Zachary A Wright; Yazan A Majeed; James L Patton; Felix C Huang
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 4.262

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.