Literature DB >> 12680493

Quality of red blood cells using autotransfusion devices: a comparative analysis.

Cyril J Serrick1, Mary Scholz, Arthur Melo, Onkar Singh, Dionne Noel.   

Abstract

Cell salvage devices are routinely used to process and wash red blood cells (RBCs) shed during surgical interventions. Although the principle theory of cell saving is the same, the actual process to achieve this is very different from one device to another. The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of washed, concentrated RBC produced by five very different cell-saving devices, specifically the Cobe BRAT 2, Medtronic Sequestra 1000, Haemonetics Cell Saver 5, Medtronic Autolog, and the Fresenius CATS. Reservoir and washed red blood cells were analyzed for hematocrit (Hct), platelets (PLT), leukocytes (WBC), potassium (K+), heparin, plasma-free hemoglobin (PFH), RBC mass recovery and recovery rate. The Haemonetics and BRAT 2 had the highest RBC recovery. All devices adequately removed heparin and potassium. The Medtronic Autolog had the highest removal of platelets and PFH; whereas, the BRAT had the lowest. Although the Autolog had the highest leukocyte removal, leukocytes were not adequately washed out by any of the autotransfusion devices. In conclusion, although all cell-saving devices use the same theory of centrifugation, the actual quality of the washed RBC product differs widely from one device to another.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12680493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol        ISSN: 0022-1058


  16 in total

1.  Cell salvage is beneficial for all cardiac surgical patients: arguments for and against.

Authors:  Robert A Baker; Alan F Merry
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2012-03

Review 2.  Laboratory characteristics and clinical utility of post-operative cell salvage: washed or unwashed blood transfusion?

Authors:  Manuel Muñoz; Robert Slappendel; Dafydd Thomas
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Partial bowls using the Haemonetics Cell Saver 5: does it produce a quality product?

Authors:  Cyril J Serrick; Mary Scholz
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2005-06

4.  The Influence of Intraoperative Autotransfusion on Postoperative Hematocrit after Cardiac Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Andrew J Stasko; Alfred H Stammers; Linda B Mongero; Eric A Tesdahl; Samuel Weinstein
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2017-12

5.  In Vitro Evaluation of the Fresenius Kabi CATSmart Autotransfusion System.

Authors:  Melissa Alberts; Robert C Groom; Richard Walczak; Robert Kramer; Adrienne Karpiel; Jeanette Dieter; Lisa Sheth; Nathaniel H Greene; Edmund H Jooste
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2017-06

6.  The Impact of Three Different Wash Solutions on Autotransfusion Products.

Authors:  Todd M Ratliff; Jeffery L Burnside; Ashley B Hodge; Aymen N Naguib; Daniel Gomez
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2018-06

7.  Prolonged EVLP Using OCS Lung: Cellular and Acellular Perfusates.

Authors:  Gabriel Loor; Brian T Howard; John R Spratt; Lars M Mattison; Angela Panoskaltsis-Mortari; Roland Z Brown; Tinen L Iles; Carolyn M Meyer; Haylie R Helms; Andrew Price; Paul A Iaizzo
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Intraoperative Cell Saving: Is the Solution the Actual Problem?

Authors:  Krishnan Pillay; Shobashini Perumal
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2021-03

9.  On-line autotransfusion waste calculator.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Riley; Keith A Samolyk
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2008-03

Review 10.  Prevention of lung injury in cardiac surgery: a review.

Authors:  Robert W Young
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2014-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.