Literature DB >> 25326728

Use of left ventricular support devices during acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Jon Spiro1, Sagar N Doshi.   

Abstract

In an effort to improve outcomes in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), percutaneous ventricular assist devices (PVADs) have been investigated in (1) high-risk PCI, (2) acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) and (3) in AMI without CS. PCI has become an increasing complex due to an ageing population with complex disease and the frequent presence of impaired LV function. Patients undergoing high-risk PCI in these circumstances are prone to acute cardiovascular collapse. Additionally, mortality in AMI complicated by CS remains high. Lastly, LV support during AMI may reduce infarct size and therefore preserve LV function. At present, four commercially available devices exist: intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP), Impella, TandemHeart and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). These devices are employed in an effort to increase cardiac output, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and coronary perfusion and to reduce pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP). The mechanism of action differs with each device, and there are advantages and disadvantages. In this update, we discuss recent data describing the use of PVADs to support patients with AMI with or without cardiogenic shock and during high-risk PCI. We focus on the unique features of each device, highlighting strengths, weaknesses and frequently encountered complications, which may be important when tailoring the most appropriate PVAD therapy to an individual patient's need.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25326728     DOI: 10.1007/s11886-014-0544-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3782            Impact factor:   2.931


  51 in total

1.  Do not get in RAGE in cardiogenic shock: it is detrimental!

Authors:  Karl Werdan
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  The calm after the storm: long-term survival after cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Judith S Hochman; Renato Apolito
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  The outcome of intra-aortic balloon pump support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock according to the type of revascularization: a comprehensive meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francesco Romeo; Maria Cristina Acconcia; Domenico Sergi; Alessia Romeo; Saverio Muscoli; Serafina Valente; Gian Franco Gensini; Flavia Chiarotti; Quintilio Caretta
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Peter Sick; Enno Boudriot; Klaus-Werner Diederich; Rainer Hambrecht; Josef Niebauer; Gerhard Schuler
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-02-25       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Combination use of a TandemHeart with an extracorporeal oxygenator in the treatment of five patients with refractory cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Yat Wa Li; Warren D Rosenblum; Alan L Gass; Melvin B Weiss; Wilbert S Aronow
Journal:  Am J Ther       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.688

6.  Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  J S Hochman; L A Sleeper; J G Webb; T A Sanborn; H D White; J D Talley; C E Buller; A K Jacobs; J N Slater; J Col; S M McKinlay; T H LeJemtel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-08-26       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction).

Authors:  Elliott M Antman; Daniel T Anbe; Paul Wayne Armstrong; Eric R Bates; Lee A Green; Mary Hand; Judith S Hochman; Harlan M Krumholz; Frederick G Kushner; Gervasio A Lamas; Charles J Mullany; Joseph P Ornato; David L Pearle; Michael A Sloan; Sidney C Smith; Joseph S Alpert; Jeffrey L Anderson; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Raymond J Gibbons; Gabriel Gregoratos; Jonathan L Halperin; Loren F Hiratzka; Sharon Ann Hunt; Alice K Jacobs
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  The use of intraaortic balloon pumping as an adjunct to reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction. The Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) Study Group.

Authors:  E M Ohman; R M Califf; B S George; P J Quigley; D J Kereiakes; L Harrelson-Woodlief; R J Candela; C Flanagan; R S Stack; E J Topol
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 9.  Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Richard W Smalling; Gerhard C Schuler
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  The TandemHeart, percutaneous transseptal left ventricular assist device: a safeguard in high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions. The six-year Rotterdam experience.

Authors:  Pascal Vranckx; Emanuele Meliga; Peter P T De Jaegere; Martin Van den Ent; Evelyn S Regar; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.534

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Current Concepts and New Trends in the Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Theodora Benedek; Dan Dobreanu
Journal:  J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures)       Date:  2015-03-01

Review 2.  Contemporary device management of cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Tariq Suleiman; Alexander Scott; David Tong; Vikram Khanna; Vijay Kunadian
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.214

3.  Short-Term Outcomes of Elective High-Risk PCI with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support: A Single-Centre Registry.

Authors:  Alexander M Griffioen; Stijn C H Van Den Oord; Marleen H Van Wely; Gerard C Swart; Herbert B Van Wetten; Peter W Danse; Peter Damman; Niels Van Royen; Robert Jan M Van Geuns
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 1.776

4.  Effects and safety of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shuo Pang; Guangrui Miao; Xiaoyan Zhao
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-27

5.  Prophylactic veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  F S van den Brink; T A Meijers; S H Hofma; A J van Boven; A Nap; A Vonk; P Symersky; K D Sjauw; P Knaapen
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.380

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.